⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Jannillea Glasgow vs Shubman Gill — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Jannillea Glasgow (West Indies Women) has 127 T20I runs at avg 15.9 in 17 matches. Shubman Gill (India) has 846 T20I runs at avg 12.1 in 35 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Jannillea Glasgow vs Shubman Gill — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Jannillea Glasgow | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 10 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 13 | 95 |
| Best fantasy score | 20 | 244 |
| Runs | 57 | 1076 |
| Strike rate | 66.3 | 111.2 |
| Fours | 4 | 132 |
| Sixes | 0 | 28 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 7 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 3 |
| Highest score | 15 | 154 |
| Catches | 6 | 12 |
| Total dismissals | 7 | 15 |
| Statistic | Jannillea Glasgow | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 17 | 35 |
| Runs | 127 | 846 |
| Batting average | 15.88 | 12.09 |
| Strike rate | 89.4 | 53.6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 1 | 3 |
| Wickets | 3 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 25.33 | — |
| Economy rate | 6.61 | 5.85 |
Jannillea Glasgow vs Shubman Gill — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Jannillea Glasgow has scored 127 T20I runs in 17 matches at an average of 15.88, with 1 half-century. She has also taken 3 T20I wickets at an average of 25.33 with an economy of 6.61.
T20I career: Shubman Gill has scored 846 T20I runs in 35 matches at an average of 12.09, with 1 century.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shubman Gill is the stronger pick with an average of 95 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.