⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Jasprit Bumrah vs Makhaya Ntini — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Makhaya Ntini has the edge on the headline numbers: Makhaya Ntini leads on T20I batting (10 runs, avg 5.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Jasprit Bumrah (India) has 12 T20I runs at avg 2.0 in 100 matches. Makhaya Ntini () has 10 T20I runs at avg 5.0 in 10 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Jasprit Bumrah vs Makhaya Ntini — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Jasprit Bumrah | Makhaya Ntini |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 0 |
| Avg fantasy points | 26 | 0 |
| Best fantasy score | 74 | 0 |
| Runs | 25 | 0 |
| Strike rate | 166.7 | 0.0 |
| Fours | 4 | 0 |
| Sixes | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 20 | 0 |
| Wickets | 11 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 7.06 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 2 | 0 |
| Catches | 3 | 0 |
| Total dismissals | 3 | 0 |
| Statistic | Jasprit Bumrah | Makhaya Ntini |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 100 | 10 |
| Runs | 12 | 10 |
| Batting average | 2.00 | 5.00 |
| Strike rate | 66.7 | 90.9 |
| Wickets | 126 | 6 |
| Bowling average | 18.21 | 49.67 |
| Economy rate | — | 9.31 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Jasprit Bumrah has played 100 T20Is and Makhaya Ntini 10. Jasprit Bumrah has 12 runs at 2.0 (strike rate 66.7), against 10 at 5.0 (90.9) for Makhaya Ntini, so Jasprit Bumrah has scored more. With the ball, Jasprit Bumrah has 126 wickets and Makhaya Ntini 6 at 9.31; Jasprit Bumrah has more wickets.
ODI. Jasprit Bumrah has played 91 ODIs and Makhaya Ntini 173. Jasprit Bumrah has 111 runs at 9.3 (strike rate 64.9), against 199 at 8.7 (66.8) for Makhaya Ntini, so Makhaya Ntini has scored more. With the ball, Jasprit Bumrah has 151 wickets and Makhaya Ntini 266 at 4.53; Makhaya Ntini has more wickets.
Test. Jasprit Bumrah has played 52 Tests and Makhaya Ntini 101. Jasprit Bumrah has 348 runs at 6.6 (strike rate 41.3), against 699 at 9.8 (48.6) for Makhaya Ntini, so Makhaya Ntini has scored more. With the ball, Jasprit Bumrah has 234 wickets at an economy of 2.77 and Makhaya Ntini 390 at 3.24; Makhaya Ntini has more wickets while Jasprit Bumrah is more economical.
International numbers up to 16 July 2026.
Jasprit Bumrah vs Makhaya Ntini — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Jasprit Bumrah has scored 12 T20I runs in 100 matches at an average of 2.00. He has also taken 126 T20I wickets at an average of 18.21.
T20I career: Makhaya Ntini has scored 10 T20I runs in 10 matches at an average of 5.00. He has also taken 6 T20I wickets at an average of 49.67 with an economy of 9.31.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Jasprit Bumrah is the stronger pick with an average of 26 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Jasprit Bumrah or Makhaya Ntini?
Jasprit Bumrah vs Makhaya Ntini — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Jasprit Bumrah or Makhaya Ntini?
What is the price difference between Jasprit Bumrah and Makhaya Ntini?
How many MOTM awards have Jasprit Bumrah and Makhaya Ntini won?
Should I pick Jasprit Bumrah or Makhaya Ntini in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Jasprit Bumrah or Makhaya Ntini?
Who has taken more T20I wickets, Jasprit Bumrah or Makhaya Ntini?
Who has more ODI runs, Jasprit Bumrah or Makhaya Ntini?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Jasprit Bumrah or Makhaya Ntini?
Who has more Test runs, Jasprit Bumrah or Makhaya Ntini?
Who has taken more Test wickets, Jasprit Bumrah or Makhaya Ntini?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Jasprit Bumrah or Makhaya Ntini — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.