⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Jasprit Bumrah vs Matt Renshaw — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Jasprit Bumrah (India) has 12 T20I runs at avg 2.4 in 92 matches. Matt Renshaw (Australia) has 233 T20I runs at avg 46.6 in 9 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Jasprit Bumrah vs Matt Renshaw — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Jasprit Bumrah | Matt Renshaw |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 15 | 3 |
| Avg fantasy points | 20 | 62 |
| Best fantasy score | 64 | 87 |
| Runs | 25 | 108 |
| Strike rate | 166.7 | 90.8 |
| Fours | 4 | 8 |
| Sixes | 1 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 1 |
| Highest score | 20 | 61 |
| Wickets | 6 | 1 |
| Economy rate | 7.15 | 4.70 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 1 | 1 |
| Catches | 2 | 0 |
| Total dismissals | 2 | 0 |
| Statistic | Jasprit Bumrah | Matt Renshaw |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 92 | 9 |
| Runs | 12 | 233 |
| Batting average | 2.40 | 46.60 |
| Strike rate | 66.7 | 235.3 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 2 |
| Wickets | 118 | 3 |
| Bowling average | 18.52 | 0.00 |
| Economy rate | 6.63 | — |
Jasprit Bumrah vs Matt Renshaw — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Jasprit Bumrah has scored 12 T20I runs in 92 matches at an average of 2.40. He has also taken 118 T20I wickets at an average of 18.52 with an economy of 6.63.
T20I career: Matt Renshaw has scored 233 T20I runs in 9 matches at an average of 46.60, with 2 half-centuries. He has also taken 3 T20I wickets.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Matt Renshaw is the stronger pick with an average of 62 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.