⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Jasprit Bumrah vs Nadine de Klerk: Who Is Better? International Stats Comparison
Nadine de Klerk has the edge on the headline numbers: Nadine de Klerk leads on T20I batting (837 runs, avg 23.9). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Jasprit Bumrah (India) has 12 T20I runs at avg 2.0 in 100 matches. Nadine de Klerk (South Africa Women) has 837 T20I runs at avg 23.9 in 86 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Jasprit Bumrah vs Nadine de Klerk — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Jasprit Bumrah | Nadine de Klerk |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 14 |
| Avg fantasy points | 26 | 59 |
| Best fantasy score | 74 | 126 |
| Runs | 25 | 261 |
| Strike rate | 166.7 | 120.3 |
| Fours | 4 | 20 |
| Sixes | 1 | 10 |
| Highest score | 20 | 41 |
| Wickets | 11 | 14 |
| Economy rate | 7.06 | 9.44 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 2 | 2 |
| Catches | 3 | 3 |
| Total dismissals | 3 | 5 |
| Statistic | Jasprit Bumrah | Nadine de Klerk |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 100 | 86 |
| Runs | 12 | 837 |
| Batting average | 2.00 | 23.91 |
| Strike rate | 66.7 | 106.0 |
| Wickets | 126 | 64 |
| Bowling average | 18.21 | 27.14 |
| Economy rate | — | 7.70 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Jasprit Bumrah has played 100 T20Is and Nadine de Klerk 86. Jasprit Bumrah has 12 runs at 2.0 (strike rate 66.7), against 837 at 23.9 (106.0) for Nadine de Klerk, so Nadine de Klerk has scored more. With the ball, Jasprit Bumrah has 126 wickets and Nadine de Klerk 64 at 7.70; Jasprit Bumrah has more wickets.
ODI. Jasprit Bumrah has played 91 ODIs and Nadine de Klerk 64. Jasprit Bumrah has 111 runs at 9.3 (strike rate 64.9), against 1,058 at 24.6 (89.1) for Nadine de Klerk, so Nadine de Klerk has scored more. With the ball, Jasprit Bumrah has 151 wickets and Nadine de Klerk 74 at 5.22; Jasprit Bumrah has more wickets.
Test. Jasprit Bumrah has played 52 Tests and Nadine de Klerk 4. Jasprit Bumrah has 348 runs at 6.6 (strike rate 41.3), against 114 at 16.3 (40.7) for Nadine de Klerk, so Jasprit Bumrah has scored more. With the ball, Jasprit Bumrah has 234 wickets at an economy of 2.77 and Nadine de Klerk 4 at 4.09; Jasprit Bumrah has more wickets.
International numbers up to 16 July 2026.
Jasprit Bumrah vs Nadine de Klerk — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Jasprit Bumrah has scored 12 T20I runs in 100 matches at an average of 2.00. He has also taken 126 T20I wickets at an average of 18.21.
T20I career: Nadine de Klerk has scored 837 T20I runs in 86 matches at an average of 23.91. She has also taken 64 T20I wickets at an average of 27.14 with an economy of 7.70.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Nadine de Klerk is the stronger pick with an average of 59 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Jasprit Bumrah or Nadine de Klerk?
Jasprit Bumrah vs Nadine de Klerk — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Jasprit Bumrah or Nadine de Klerk?
What is the price difference between Jasprit Bumrah and Nadine de Klerk?
How many MOTM awards have Jasprit Bumrah and Nadine de Klerk won?
Should I pick Jasprit Bumrah or Nadine de Klerk in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Jasprit Bumrah or Nadine de Klerk?
Who has taken more T20I wickets, Jasprit Bumrah or Nadine de Klerk?
Who has more ODI runs, Jasprit Bumrah or Nadine de Klerk?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Jasprit Bumrah or Nadine de Klerk?
Who has more Test runs, Jasprit Bumrah or Nadine de Klerk?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Jasprit Bumrah or Nadine de Klerk — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.