⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Jos Buttler vs Michael Bracewell — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Jos Buttler has the edge on the headline numbers: Jos Buttler leads on T20I batting (4,384 runs, avg 34.8). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Jos Buttler (England) has 4,384 T20I runs at avg 34.8 in 163 matches. Michael Bracewell (Amsterdam Flames) has 434 T20I runs at avg 19.7 in 47 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Jos Buttler vs Michael Bracewell — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Jos Buttler | Michael Bracewell |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 18 |
| Avg fantasy points | 82 | 69 |
| Best fantasy score | 271 | 204 |
| Runs | 800 | 124 |
| Strike rate | 167.0 | 87.3 |
| Fours | 63 | 15 |
| Sixes | 48 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 7 | 0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 131 | 32 |
| Wickets | 0 | 28 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 5.44 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 5 |
| Catches | 15 | 5 |
| Total dismissals | 22 | 5 |
| Statistic | Jos Buttler | Michael Bracewell |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 163 | 47 |
| Runs | 4384 | 434 |
| Batting average | 34.79 | 19.73 |
| Strike rate | — | 134.4 |
| Centuries (100+) | 2 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 30 | 2 |
| Wickets | 0 | 35 |
| Bowling average | — | 21.14 |
| Economy rate | — | 7.34 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Jos Buttler has played 163 T20Is and Michael Bracewell 47. Jos Buttler has 4,384 runs at 34.8, against 434 at 19.7 (134.4) for Michael Bracewell, so Jos Buttler has scored more. Hundreds: Jos Buttler 2, Michael Bracewell 0. Fifties: 30 and 2. Michael Bracewell also bowls: 35 wickets at an economy of 7.34, while Jos Buttler has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Jos Buttler has played 204 ODIs and Michael Bracewell 48. Jos Buttler has 5,678 runs at 39.2, against 1,042 at 35.9 (107.5) for Michael Bracewell, so Jos Buttler has scored more. Hundreds: Jos Buttler 11, Michael Bracewell 2. Fifties: 30 and 3. Michael Bracewell also bowls: 46 wickets at an economy of 4.93, while Jos Buttler has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Jos Buttler has played 57 Tests and Michael Bracewell 10. Jos Buttler has 2,907 runs at 31.9 (strike rate 54.2), against 339 at 21.2 (57.1) for Michael Bracewell, so Jos Buttler has scored more. Hundreds: Jos Buttler 2, Michael Bracewell 0. Fifties: 18 and 1. Michael Bracewell also bowls: 25 wickets at an economy of 3.60, while Jos Buttler has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 21 July 2026.
Jos Buttler vs Michael Bracewell — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Jos Buttler has scored 4,384 T20I runs in 163 matches at an average of 34.79, with 2 centuries.
T20I career: Michael Bracewell has scored 434 T20I runs in 47 matches at an average of 19.73, with 2 half-centuries. He has also taken 35 T20I wickets at an average of 21.14 with an economy of 7.34.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Jos Buttler is the stronger pick with an average of 82 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Jos Buttler or Michael Bracewell?
Jos Buttler vs Michael Bracewell — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Jos Buttler or Michael Bracewell?
What is the price difference between Jos Buttler and Michael Bracewell?
How many MOTM awards have Jos Buttler and Michael Bracewell won?
Should I pick Jos Buttler or Michael Bracewell in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Jos Buttler or Michael Bracewell?
Who has more ODI runs, Jos Buttler or Michael Bracewell?
Who has more Test runs, Jos Buttler or Michael Bracewell?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Jos Buttler or Michael Bracewell — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.