⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Jos Buttler vs Mitchell Santner — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Jos Buttler has the edge on the headline numbers: Jos Buttler leads on T20I batting (4,384 runs, avg 34.8). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Jos Buttler (England) has 4,384 T20I runs at avg 34.8 in 163 matches. Mitchell Santner (Edinburgh Castle Rockers) has 1,108 T20I runs at avg 20.5 in 138 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Jos Buttler vs Mitchell Santner — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Jos Buttler | Mitchell Santner |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 82 | 65 |
| Best fantasy score | 271 | 207 |
| Runs | 800 | 298 |
| Strike rate | 167.0 | 151.3 |
| Fours | 63 | 25 |
| Sixes | 48 | 12 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 7 | 1 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 131 | 52 |
| Wickets | 0 | 18 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 6.70 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 5 |
| Catches | 15 | 8 |
| Total dismissals | 22 | 9 |
| Statistic | Jos Buttler | Mitchell Santner |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 163 | 138 |
| Runs | 4384 | 1108 |
| Batting average | 34.79 | 20.52 |
| Strike rate | — | 133.2 |
| Centuries (100+) | 2 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 30 | 2 |
| Wickets | 0 | 142 |
| Bowling average | — | 23.33 |
| Economy rate | — | 7.17 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Jos Buttler has played 163 T20Is and Mitchell Santner 138. Jos Buttler has 4,384 runs at 34.8, against 1,108 at 20.5 (133.2) for Mitchell Santner, so Jos Buttler has scored more. Hundreds: Jos Buttler 2, Mitchell Santner 0. Fifties: 30 and 2. Mitchell Santner also bowls: 142 wickets at an economy of 7.17, while Jos Buttler has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Jos Buttler has played 204 ODIs and Mitchell Santner 129. Jos Buttler has 5,678 runs at 39.2, against 1,648 at 27.0 (92.4) for Mitchell Santner, so Jos Buttler has scored more. Hundreds: Jos Buttler 11, Mitchell Santner 0. Fifties: 30 and 3. Mitchell Santner also bowls: 139 wickets, while Jos Buttler has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Jos Buttler has played 57 Tests and Mitchell Santner 33. Jos Buttler has 2,907 runs at 31.9 (strike rate 54.2), against 1,089 at 24.8 (47.0) for Mitchell Santner, so Jos Buttler has scored more. Hundreds: Jos Buttler 2, Mitchell Santner 1. Fifties: 18 and 4. Mitchell Santner also bowls: 80 wickets at an economy of 2.86, while Jos Buttler has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 21 July 2026.
Jos Buttler vs Mitchell Santner — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Jos Buttler has scored 4,384 T20I runs in 163 matches at an average of 34.79, with 2 centuries.
T20I career: Mitchell Santner has scored 1,108 T20I runs in 138 matches at an average of 20.52, with 2 half-centuries. He has also taken 142 T20I wickets at an average of 23.33 with an economy of 7.17.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Jos Buttler is the stronger pick with an average of 82 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Jos Buttler or Mitchell Santner?
Jos Buttler vs Mitchell Santner — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Jos Buttler or Mitchell Santner?
What is the price difference between Jos Buttler and Mitchell Santner?
How many MOTM awards have Jos Buttler and Mitchell Santner won?
Should I pick Jos Buttler or Mitchell Santner in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Jos Buttler or Mitchell Santner?
Who has more ODI runs, Jos Buttler or Mitchell Santner?
Who has more Test runs, Jos Buttler or Mitchell Santner?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Jos Buttler or Mitchell Santner — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.