⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Jos Buttler vs Sikandar Raza: Who Is Better? International Stats Comparison
Jos Buttler has the edge on the headline numbers: Jos Buttler leads on T20I batting (4,384 runs, avg 34.8). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Jos Buttler (England) has 4,384 T20I runs at avg 34.8 in 163 matches. Sikandar Raza (Zimbabwe) has 2,740 T20I runs at avg 25.6 in 123 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Jos Buttler vs Sikandar Raza — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Jos Buttler | Sikandar Raza |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 82 | 63 |
| Best fantasy score | 271 | 169 |
| Runs | 800 | 452 |
| Strike rate | 167.0 | 97.4 |
| Fours | 63 | 37 |
| Sixes | 48 | 12 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 7 | 2 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 131 | 81 |
| Wickets | 0 | 14 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 6.37 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 2 |
| Catches | 15 | 10 |
| Total dismissals | 22 | 12 |
| Statistic | Jos Buttler | Sikandar Raza |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 163 | 123 |
| Runs | 4384 | 2740 |
| Batting average | 34.79 | 25.61 |
| Strike rate | — | 136.3 |
| Centuries (100+) | 2 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 30 | 15 |
| Wickets | 0 | 103 |
| Bowling average | — | 24.06 |
| Economy rate | — | 7.08 |
| Five-wicket hauls | 0 | 1 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Jos Buttler has played 163 T20Is and Sikandar Raza 123. Jos Buttler has 4,384 runs at 34.8, against 2,740 at 25.6 (136.3) for Sikandar Raza, so Jos Buttler has scored more. Hundreds: Jos Buttler 2, Sikandar Raza 1. Fifties: 30 and 15. Sikandar Raza also bowls: 103 wickets at an economy of 7.08, while Jos Buttler has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Jos Buttler has played 204 ODIs and Sikandar Raza 128. Jos Buttler has 5,678 runs at 39.2, against 3,707 at 36.7 (87.8) for Sikandar Raza, so Jos Buttler has scored more. Hundreds: Jos Buttler 11, Sikandar Raza 6. Fifties: 30 and 20. Sikandar Raza also bowls: 76 wickets at an economy of 4.96, while Jos Buttler has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Jos Buttler has played 57 Tests and Sikandar Raza 18. Jos Buttler has 2,907 runs at 31.9 (strike rate 54.2), against 1,120 at 31.1 (54.6) for Sikandar Raza, so Jos Buttler has scored more. Hundreds: Jos Buttler 2, Sikandar Raza 1. Fifties: 18 and 8. Sikandar Raza also bowls: 34 wickets at an economy of 3.30, while Jos Buttler has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 1 September 2026.
Jos Buttler vs Sikandar Raza — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Jos Buttler has scored 4,384 T20I runs in 163 matches at an average of 34.79, with 2 centuries.
T20I career: Sikandar Raza has scored 2,740 T20I runs in 123 matches at an average of 25.61, with 1 century. He has also taken 103 T20I wickets at an average of 24.06 with an economy of 7.08.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Jos Buttler is the stronger pick with an average of 82 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Jos Buttler or Sikandar Raza?
Jos Buttler vs Sikandar Raza — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Jos Buttler or Sikandar Raza?
What is the price difference between Jos Buttler and Sikandar Raza?
How many MOTM awards have Jos Buttler and Sikandar Raza won?
Should I pick Jos Buttler or Sikandar Raza in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Jos Buttler or Sikandar Raza?
Who has more ODI runs, Jos Buttler or Sikandar Raza?
Who has more Test runs, Jos Buttler or Sikandar Raza?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Jos Buttler or Sikandar Raza — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.