⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Jos Buttler vs Washington Sundar — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Jos Buttler has the edge on the headline numbers: Jos Buttler leads on T20I batting (4,384 runs, avg 34.8). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Jos Buttler (England) has 4,384 T20I runs at avg 34.8 in 163 matches. Washington Sundar (India) has 254 T20I runs at avg 16.9 in 58 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Jos Buttler vs Washington Sundar — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Jos Buttler | Washington Sundar |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 82 | 53 |
| Best fantasy score | 271 | 223 |
| Runs | 800 | 387 |
| Strike rate | 167.0 | 112.2 |
| Fours | 63 | 37 |
| Sixes | 48 | 9 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 7 | 4 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 131 | 52 |
| Wickets | 0 | 9 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 5.17 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 5 |
| Catches | 15 | 8 |
| Total dismissals | 22 | 8 |
| Statistic | Jos Buttler | Washington Sundar |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 163 | 58 |
| Runs | 4384 | 254 |
| Batting average | 34.79 | 16.93 |
| Centuries (100+) | 2 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 30 | 1 |
| Wickets | 0 | 51 |
| Bowling average | — | 22.80 |
| Economy rate | — | 7.08 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Jos Buttler has played 163 T20Is and Washington Sundar 58. Jos Buttler has 4,384 runs at 34.8, against 254 at 16.9 for Washington Sundar, so Jos Buttler has scored more. Hundreds: Jos Buttler 2, Washington Sundar 0. Fifties: 30 and 1. Washington Sundar also bowls: 51 wickets at an economy of 7.08, while Jos Buttler has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Jos Buttler has played 204 ODIs and Washington Sundar 31. Jos Buttler has 5,678 runs at 39.2, against 426 at 22.4 (81.9) for Washington Sundar, so Jos Buttler has scored more. Hundreds: Jos Buttler 11, Washington Sundar 0. Fifties: 30 and 2. Washington Sundar also bowls: 29 wickets at an economy of 4.91, while Jos Buttler has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Jos Buttler has played 57 Tests and Washington Sundar 17. Jos Buttler has 2,907 runs at 31.9 (strike rate 54.2), against 885 at 42.1 (45.9) for Washington Sundar, so Jos Buttler has scored more. Hundreds: Jos Buttler 2, Washington Sundar 1. Fifties: 18 and 5. Washington Sundar also bowls: 36 wickets at an economy of 3.26, while Jos Buttler has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 19 July 2026.
Jos Buttler vs Washington Sundar — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Jos Buttler has scored 4,384 T20I runs in 163 matches at an average of 34.79, with 2 centuries.
T20I career: Washington Sundar has scored 254 T20I runs in 58 matches at an average of 16.93, with 1 half-century. He has also taken 51 T20I wickets at an average of 22.80 with an economy of 7.08.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Jos Buttler is the stronger pick with an average of 82 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Jos Buttler or Washington Sundar?
Jos Buttler vs Washington Sundar — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Jos Buttler or Washington Sundar?
What is the price difference between Jos Buttler and Washington Sundar?
How many MOTM awards have Jos Buttler and Washington Sundar won?
Should I pick Jos Buttler or Washington Sundar in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Jos Buttler or Washington Sundar?
Who has more ODI runs, Jos Buttler or Washington Sundar?
Who has more Test runs, Jos Buttler or Washington Sundar?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Jos Buttler or Washington Sundar — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.