⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Josh Tongue vs Michael Bracewell — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Michael Bracewell has the edge on the headline numbers: Michael Bracewell leads on T20I bowling (35 wickets, avg 21.1). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Josh Tongue (England) has 0 T20I runs in 5 matches. Michael Bracewell (Amsterdam Flames) has 434 T20I runs at avg 19.7 in 47 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Josh Tongue vs Michael Bracewell — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Josh Tongue | Michael Bracewell |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 18 |
| Avg fantasy points | 66 | 69 |
| Best fantasy score | 269 | 204 |
| Runs | 75 | 124 |
| Strike rate | 72.8 | 87.3 |
| Fours | 12 | 15 |
| Sixes | 0 | 1 |
| Highest score | 42 | 32 |
| Wickets | 36 | 28 |
| Economy rate | 6.51 | 5.44 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 8 | 5 |
| Catches | 2 | 5 |
| Total dismissals | 2 | 5 |
| Statistic | Josh Tongue | Michael Bracewell |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 5 | 47 |
| Runs | 0 | 434 |
| Batting average | — | 19.73 |
| Strike rate | — | 134.4 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 2 |
| Wickets | 8 | 35 |
| Bowling average | 20.38 | 21.14 |
| Economy rate | 10.19 | 7.34 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Josh Tongue has played 5 T20Is and Michael Bracewell 47. Josh Tongue has 0 runs, against 434 at 19.7 (134.4) for Michael Bracewell, so Michael Bracewell has scored more. With the ball, Josh Tongue has 8 wickets at an economy of 10.19 and Michael Bracewell 35 at 7.34; Michael Bracewell has more wickets.
ODI. Josh Tongue has played 4 ODIs and Michael Bracewell 48. Josh Tongue has 1 runs at 1.0 (strike rate 50.0), against 1,042 at 35.9 (107.5) for Michael Bracewell, so Michael Bracewell has scored more. Hundreds: Josh Tongue 0, Michael Bracewell 2. Fifties: 0 and 3. With the ball, Josh Tongue has 2 wickets at an economy of 6.20 and Michael Bracewell 46 at 4.93; Michael Bracewell has more wickets.
Test. Josh Tongue has played 15 Tests and Michael Bracewell 10. Josh Tongue has 133 runs at 7.8 (strike rate 46.8), against 339 at 21.2 (57.1) for Michael Bracewell, so Michael Bracewell has scored more. With the ball, Josh Tongue has 76 wickets and Michael Bracewell 25 at 3.60; Josh Tongue has more wickets.
International numbers up to 27 August 2026.
Josh Tongue vs Michael Bracewell — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: He has also taken 8 T20I wickets at an average of 20.38 with an economy of 10.19.
T20I career: Michael Bracewell has scored 434 T20I runs in 47 matches at an average of 19.73, with 2 half-centuries. He has also taken 35 T20I wickets at an average of 21.14 with an economy of 7.34.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Michael Bracewell is the stronger pick with an average of 69 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Josh Tongue or Michael Bracewell?
Josh Tongue vs Michael Bracewell — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Josh Tongue or Michael Bracewell?
What is the price difference between Josh Tongue and Michael Bracewell?
How many MOTM awards have Josh Tongue and Michael Bracewell won?
Should I pick Josh Tongue or Michael Bracewell in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Josh Tongue or Michael Bracewell?
Who has taken more T20I wickets, Josh Tongue or Michael Bracewell?
Who has more ODI runs, Josh Tongue or Michael Bracewell?
Who has more Test runs, Josh Tongue or Michael Bracewell?
Who has taken more Test wickets, Josh Tongue or Michael Bracewell?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Josh Tongue or Michael Bracewell — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.