⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD

Kagiso Rabada vs Will JacksInternational Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison

Kagiso Rabada (Gujarat Titans) has 184 T20I runs at avg 14.2 in 76 matches. Will Jacks (England) has 630 T20I runs at avg 22.5 in 40 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.

Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form

TweetWhatsApp
PLAYER 1
🏏
Kagiso Rabada
GT · 9 cr
VS
PLAYER 2
🏏
Will Jacks
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 ENG · 9 cr
🏏
Kagiso Rabada
Gujarat Titans
BOWL🌏 OS🏅 2× MOTM
9 cr
Credits
61
Avg Pts
130
Best FP
115.2
Pts/Cr
47
Total Runs
29
Total Wkts
🏏
Will Jacks
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 England
BAT🌏 OS🏅 1× MOTM
9 cr
Credits
44
Avg Pts
118
Best FP
93.8
Pts/Cr
352
Total Runs
6
Total Wkts
⚠️These players are from different series — comparing all-time stats. For fairest comparison, pick two players from the same competition.
🔥 Clear Pick
🏏 Kagiso Rabada
17 higher avg pts · 130 best fantasy score · 2× MOTM
🏏 Kagiso Rabada
VS
🏏 Will Jacks
T20I Career Overview
76Matches40
🏏 Batting
184Runs630
14.15Batting Avg22.50
115.72Strike Rate147.20
0Centuries0
0Half-Centuries1
6Sixes 🔴29
22
Best Score
53*
🎳 Bowling
78Wickets16
29.35Bowling Avg19.50
8.41Economy Rate8.67
05-Wkt Hauls0
3/18
Best Figures
3/14
Source: Cricsheet (cricsheet.org, CC BY 4.0) · International matches only

Kagiso Rabada vs Will Jacks — Stat Comparison Table

Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).

IPL season stats
StatisticKagiso RabadaWill Jacks
Matches1719
Avg fantasy points6144
Best fantasy score130118
Runs47352
Strike rate123.7140.2
Fours531
Sixes216
Half-centuries (50+)02
Highest score2365
Wickets296
Economy rate9.688.06
Best spell (wkts)31
Catches76
Total dismissals76
International career — T20I
StatisticKagiso RabadaWill Jacks
Matches7640
Runs184630
Batting average14.1522.50
Strike rate115.7147.2
Half-centuries (50+)01
Wickets7816
Bowling average29.3519.50
Economy rate8.418.67
Stats updated
⚡ Strengths & Captaincy Pick
🏏 Kagiso Rabada
More wickets
Higher avg fantasy pts
More MOTM awards
🏏 Will Jacks
Superior run-scorer
Higher strike rate
More big-hitting sixes
Better economy rate
👑 Captaincy Recommendation
C: 🏏 Kagiso Rabada
61 avg pts · 130 best · 2 MOTM
VC: 🏏 Will Jacks
Captaining Kagiso Rabada gives you 2× pts. Always verify playing XI before locking.
📝 T20I Career Comparison

Kagiso Rabada vs Will JacksT20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.

T20I career: Kagiso Rabada has scored 184 T20I runs in 76 matches at an average of 14.15. He has also taken 78 T20I wickets at an average of 29.35 with an economy of 8.41.

T20I career: Will Jacks has scored 630 T20I runs in 40 matches at an average of 22.50, with 1 half-century. He has also taken 16 T20I wickets at an average of 19.50 with an economy of 8.67.

Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Kagiso Rabada is the stronger pick with an average of 61 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.

Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions
READY TO PLAY?
Pick Rabada & Jacks in your fantasy XI
Free to play · No prize pool · Just bragging rights
Build XI →

Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.

CricketDreamCRICKETDREAM FANTASY
© 2026 CricketDream · Fantasy Cricket Platform · Built for cricket fans
Disclaimer: This platform is intended for users aged 18 years and above only. CricketDream is a free, skill-based fantasy cricket platform for entertainment purposes only. No monetary transactions or prizes are involved. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, licensed by, or sponsored by the BCCI, the IPL, any IPL franchise, or any other cricket governing body. All team names, player names, and logos are property of their respective owners.
⚽ ALSO INTO FOOTBALL?
Play Fantasy Football, Draft & Predictor — on FootballDream.in
🎯 Predictor📋 Team Draft👤 Player Draft
Play Now → footballdream.in