⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Kuldeep Yadav vs Mohammed Shami — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Kuldeep Yadav has the edge on the headline numbers: Kuldeep Yadav leads on T20I batting (48 runs, avg 8.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Kuldeep Yadav (India) has 48 T20I runs at avg 8.0 in 54 matches. Mohammed Shami (Lucknow Super Giants) has 10 T20I runs at avg 5.0 in 31 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Kuldeep Yadav vs Mohammed Shami — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Kuldeep Yadav | Mohammed Shami |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 13 |
| Avg fantasy points | 38 | 36 |
| Best fantasy score | 154 | 91 |
| Runs | 39 | 31 |
| Strike rate | 52.7 | 140.9 |
| Fours | 3 | 2 |
| Sixes | 0 | 3 |
| Highest score | 18 | 12 |
| Wickets | 22 | 12 |
| Economy rate | 6.59 | 9.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 4 | 2 |
| Catches | 2 | 3 |
| Total dismissals | 2 | 3 |
| Statistic | Kuldeep Yadav | Mohammed Shami |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 54 | 31 |
| Runs | 48 | 10 |
| Batting average | 8.00 | 5.00 |
| Strike rate | 67.6 | 58.8 |
| Wickets | 95 | 30 |
| Bowling average | 13.74 | 30.47 |
| Economy rate | — | 8.79 |
| Five-wicket hauls | 2 | 0 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Kuldeep Yadav has played 54 T20Is and Mohammed Shami 31. Kuldeep Yadav has 48 runs at 8.0 (strike rate 67.6), against 10 at 5.0 (58.8) for Mohammed Shami, so Kuldeep Yadav has scored more. With the ball, Kuldeep Yadav has 95 wickets and Mohammed Shami 30 at 8.79; Kuldeep Yadav has more wickets.
ODI. Kuldeep Yadav has played 120 ODIs and Mohammed Shami 116. Kuldeep Yadav has 212 runs at 9.6 (strike rate 53.1), against 255 at 8.0 (75.7) for Mohammed Shami, so Mohammed Shami has scored more. With the ball, Kuldeep Yadav has 194 wickets at an economy of 5.12 and Mohammed Shami 231 at 5.57; Mohammed Shami has more wickets while Kuldeep Yadav is more economical.
Test. Kuldeep Yadav has played 18 Tests and Mohammed Shami 64. Kuldeep Yadav has 243 runs at 12.2 (strike rate 26.6), against 750 at 12.1 (74.6) for Mohammed Shami, so Mohammed Shami has scored more. With the ball, Kuldeep Yadav has 77 wickets at an economy of 3.56 and Mohammed Shami 229 at 3.31; Mohammed Shami has more wickets.
International numbers up to 15 August 2026.
Kuldeep Yadav vs Mohammed Shami — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Kuldeep Yadav has scored 48 T20I runs in 54 matches at an average of 8.00. He has also taken 95 T20I wickets at an average of 13.74.
T20I career: Mohammed Shami has scored 10 T20I runs in 31 matches at an average of 5.00. He has also taken 30 T20I wickets at an average of 30.47 with an economy of 8.79.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Kuldeep Yadav is the stronger pick with an average of 38 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Kuldeep Yadav or Mohammed Shami?
Kuldeep Yadav vs Mohammed Shami — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Kuldeep Yadav or Mohammed Shami?
What is the price difference between Kuldeep Yadav and Mohammed Shami?
How many MOTM awards have Kuldeep Yadav and Mohammed Shami won?
Should I pick Kuldeep Yadav or Mohammed Shami in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Kuldeep Yadav or Mohammed Shami?
Who has taken more T20I wickets, Kuldeep Yadav or Mohammed Shami?
Who has more ODI runs, Kuldeep Yadav or Mohammed Shami?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Kuldeep Yadav or Mohammed Shami?
Who has more Test runs, Kuldeep Yadav or Mohammed Shami?
Who has taken more Test wickets, Kuldeep Yadav or Mohammed Shami?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Kuldeep Yadav or Mohammed Shami — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.