⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Mady Villiers vs Virat Kohli — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Virat Kohli has the edge on the headline numbers: Virat Kohli leads on T20I batting (4,188 runs, avg 48.7). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Mady Villiers (England Women) has 52 T20I runs at avg 17.3 in 19 matches. Virat Kohli (India) has 4,188 T20I runs at avg 48.7 in 125 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Mady Villiers vs Virat Kohli — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Mady Villiers | Virat Kohli |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 8 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 60 | 81 |
| Best fantasy score | 129 | 211 |
| Runs | 66 | 890 |
| Strike rate | 52.8 | 150.6 |
| Fours | 8 | 92 |
| Sixes | 0 | 32 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 2 |
| Highest score | 36 | 139 |
| Wickets | 11 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 5.55 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 3 | 0 |
| Catches | 3 | 10 |
| Total dismissals | 3 | 11 |
| Statistic | Mady Villiers | Virat Kohli |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 19 | 125 |
| Runs | 52 | 4188 |
| Batting average | 17.33 | 48.70 |
| Strike rate | 167.7 | 137.0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 38 |
| Wickets | 17 | 4 |
| Bowling average | 16.59 | 51.00 |
| Economy rate | 6.66 | 8.05 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Mady Villiers has played 19 T20Is and Virat Kohli 125. Mady Villiers has 52 runs at 17.3 (strike rate 167.7), against 4,188 at 48.7 (137.0) for Virat Kohli, so Virat Kohli has scored more. Hundreds: Mady Villiers 0, Virat Kohli 1. Fifties: 0 and 38. With the ball, Mady Villiers has 17 wickets at an economy of 6.66 and Virat Kohli 4 at 8.05; Mady Villiers has more wickets.
ODI. Mady Villiers has played 4 ODIs and Virat Kohli 315. Mady Villiers has 32 runs at 10.7 (strike rate 103.2), against 15,080 at 59.1 (95.5) for Virat Kohli, so Virat Kohli has scored more. Hundreds: Mady Villiers 0, Virat Kohli 55. Fifties: 0 and 79. With the ball, Mady Villiers has 4 wickets at an economy of 5.43 and Virat Kohli 5 at 6.16; Virat Kohli has more wickets while Mady Villiers is more economical.
Test. Mady Villiers has played 1 Test and Virat Kohli 123. Mady Villiers has 36 runs at 18.0 (strike rate 37.5), against 9,230 at 46.9 (55.6) for Virat Kohli, so Virat Kohli has scored more. Hundreds: Mady Villiers 0, Virat Kohli 30. Fifties: 0 and 31.
International numbers up to 1 September 2026.
Mady Villiers vs Virat Kohli — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Mady Villiers has scored 52 T20I runs in 19 matches at an average of 17.33. She has also taken 17 T20I wickets at an average of 16.59 with an economy of 6.66.
T20I career: Virat Kohli has scored 4,188 T20I runs in 125 matches at an average of 48.70, with 1 century. He has also taken 4 T20I wickets at an average of 51.00 with an economy of 8.05.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Virat Kohli is the stronger pick with an average of 81 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Mady Villiers or Virat Kohli?
Mady Villiers vs Virat Kohli — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Mady Villiers or Virat Kohli?
What is the price difference between Mady Villiers and Virat Kohli?
How many MOTM awards have Mady Villiers and Virat Kohli won?
Should I pick Mady Villiers or Virat Kohli in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Mady Villiers or Virat Kohli?
Who has more ODI runs, Mady Villiers or Virat Kohli?
Who has more Test runs, Mady Villiers or Virat Kohli?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Mady Villiers or Virat Kohli — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.