⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Marco Jansen vs Mitchell Marsh: Who Is Better? IPL 2026 Stats Comparison
Mitchell Marsh has the edge on the headline numbers: Mitchell Marsh averages 93 IPL fantasy pts/match vs Marco Jansen's 57. Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Marco Jansen (Punjab Kings) averages 57 fantasy pts per match. Mitchell Marsh (Lucknow Super Giants) averages 93 fantasy pts. Full IPL stats & fantasy cricket comparison: batting, bowling, fielding, and form.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Marco Jansen vs Mitchell Marsh — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Marco Jansen | Mitchell Marsh |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 57 | 93 |
| Best fantasy score | 204 | 232 |
| Runs | 295 | 1022 |
| Strike rate | 99.3 | 160.7 |
| Fours | 31 | 98 |
| Sixes | 12 | 69 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 10 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Highest score | 85 | 111 |
| Wickets | 20 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 7.08 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 4 | 0 |
| Catches | 13 | 4 |
| Total dismissals | 15 | 4 |
| Statistic | Marco Jansen | Mitchell Marsh |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 30 | 88 |
| Runs | 268 | 2313 |
| Batting average | 17.87 | 33.52 |
| Strike rate | 153.1 | — |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 2 | 14 |
| Wickets | 33 | 17 |
| Bowling average | 29.76 | 22.76 |
| Economy rate | — | 7.74 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Marco Jansen has played 30 T20Is and Mitchell Marsh 88. Marco Jansen has 268 runs at 17.9 (strike rate 153.1), against 2,313 at 33.5 for Mitchell Marsh, so Mitchell Marsh has scored more. Hundreds: Marco Jansen 0, Mitchell Marsh 1. Fifties: 2 and 14. With the ball, Marco Jansen has 33 wickets and Mitchell Marsh 17 at 7.74; Marco Jansen has more wickets.
ODI. Marco Jansen has played 34 ODIs and Mitchell Marsh 105. Marco Jansen has 647 runs at 27.0, against 3,395 at 38.1 for Mitchell Marsh, so Mitchell Marsh has scored more. Hundreds: Marco Jansen 0, Mitchell Marsh 4. Fifties: 3 and 24. With the ball, Marco Jansen has 52 wickets and Mitchell Marsh 57 at 5.50; Mitchell Marsh has more wickets.
Test. Marco Jansen has played 21 Tests and Mitchell Marsh 46. Marco Jansen has 624 runs at 23.1 (strike rate 54.5), against 2,083 at 28.5 (56.3) for Mitchell Marsh, so Mitchell Marsh has scored more. Hundreds: Marco Jansen 0, Mitchell Marsh 3. Fifties: 4 and 9. With the ball, Marco Jansen has 89 wickets at an economy of 3.31 and Mitchell Marsh 51 at 3.55; Marco Jansen has more wickets.
International numbers up to 21 June 2026.
Marco Jansen vs Mitchell Marsh is one of the most searched cricket comparisons, combining international career stats with IPL fantasy data. Both players bring different strengths to your XI, and the right choice can be the difference between topping the leaderboard or missing out.
Marco Jansen is a all-rounder for Punjab Kings, priced at 9 Cr this season. Over 20 matches in IPL 2026, he has scored a total of 1141 fantasy points, averaging 57 pts per game with a best of 204 pts. With the bat he has accumulated 295 IPL runs at a strike rate of 99.3, and has claimed 20 IPL wickets with an economy of 7.08.
International career: Marco Jansen has scored 647 ODI runs in 34 matches at an average of 26.96, with 3 half-centuries internationally. He has also taken 52 ODI wickets at an average of 33.79. He has taken 33 T20I wickets internationally.
Mitchell Marsh is a specialist batter for Lucknow Super Giants, priced at 9.5 Cr. Across 20 matches in IPL 2026, he has earned 1855 fantasy points, averaging 93 pts per game with a best of 232 pts. He has scored 1022 IPL runs at a strike rate of 160.7. He has won 5 MOTM awards this season.
International career: Mitchell Marsh has scored 3,395 ODI runs in 105 matches at an average of 38.15, with 4 centuries internationally. He has also taken 57 ODI wickets at an average of 35.28 with an economy of 5.50. In T20Is, he has 2,313 runs across 88 matches (avg 33.5).
Batting edge: Mitchell Marsh leads with the bat this season, making them the better pick if the pitch is expected to be batting-friendly or if the match is being played on a flat track.
Bowling edge: Marco Jansen has been the more impactful bowler in IPL 2026, and becomes especially valuable in conditions that offer pace or spin movement.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Mitchell Marsh is the stronger pick right now with an average of 93 pts per game and a best score of 232 pts. The value-for-money metric (points per credit) further reinforces this — always check this number before finalising your captain or vice-captain choice.
Captaincy Recommendation: Based on IPL 2026 season form, Mitchell Marsh is the safer captaincy option. However, if the opposition's bowling or batting lineup suits the other player, consider rotating your captain pick. Always check the playing XI, pitch report, and toss result before locking in your captain.
Stats are updated after every IPL 2026 match. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool or check the Fantasy Leaderboard to see how top managers are building their teams.
Who has better IPL 2026 stats — Marco Jansen or Mitchell Marsh?
Marco Jansen vs Mitchell Marsh — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Marco Jansen or Mitchell Marsh?
What is the price difference between Marco Jansen and Mitchell Marsh?
How many MOTM awards have Marco Jansen and Mitchell Marsh won?
Should I pick Marco Jansen or Mitchell Marsh in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Marco Jansen or Mitchell Marsh?
Who has taken more T20I wickets, Marco Jansen or Mitchell Marsh?
Who has more ODI runs, Marco Jansen or Mitchell Marsh?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Marco Jansen or Mitchell Marsh?
Who has more Test runs, Marco Jansen or Mitchell Marsh?
Who has taken more Test wickets, Marco Jansen or Mitchell Marsh?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Marco Jansen or Mitchell Marsh — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.