⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Matt Henry vs Rohit Sharma — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rohit Sharma has the edge on the headline numbers: Rohit Sharma leads on T20I batting (4,231 runs, avg 32.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Matt Henry (Chennai Super Kings) has 47 T20I runs at avg 5.9 in 43 matches. Rohit Sharma (India) has 4,231 T20I runs at avg 32.0 in 159 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Matt Henry vs Rohit Sharma — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Matt Henry | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 13 | 19 |
| Avg fantasy points | 53 | 79 |
| Best fantasy score | 436 | 214 |
| Runs | 13 | 885 |
| Strike rate | 26.0 | 126.2 |
| Fours | 2 | 85 |
| Sixes | 0 | 49 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 5 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 2 |
| Highest score | 6 | 138 |
| Wickets | 19 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 5.95 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 11 | 0 |
| Catches | 2 | 9 |
| Total dismissals | 2 | 9 |
| Statistic | Matt Henry | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 43 | 159 |
| Runs | 47 | 4231 |
| Batting average | 5.88 | 32.05 |
| Strike rate | 142.4 | 140.9 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 5 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 32 |
| Wickets | 53 | 1 |
| Bowling average | 23.08 | 113.00 |
| Economy rate | — | 9.97 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Matt Henry has played 43 T20Is and Rohit Sharma 159. Matt Henry has 47 runs at 5.9 (strike rate 142.4), against 4,231 at 32.0 (140.9) for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Matt Henry 0, Rohit Sharma 5. Fifties: 0 and 32. With the ball, Matt Henry has 53 wickets and Rohit Sharma 1 at 9.97; Matt Henry has more wickets.
ODI. Matt Henry has played 95 ODIs and Rohit Sharma 291. Matt Henry has 270 runs at 10.4 (strike rate 93.1), against 12,120 at 49.3 for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Matt Henry 0, Rohit Sharma 35. Fifties: 0 and 63. With the ball, Matt Henry has 172 wickets at an economy of 5.22 and Rohit Sharma 9 at 5.24; Matt Henry has more wickets.
Test. Matt Henry has played 35 Tests and Rohit Sharma 67. Matt Henry has 676 runs at 15.7 (strike rate 75.5), against 4,301 at 40.6 (57.1) for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Matt Henry 0, Rohit Sharma 12. Fifties: 4 and 18. With the ball, Matt Henry has 152 wickets at an economy of 3.11 and Rohit Sharma 2 at 3.51; Matt Henry has more wickets.
International numbers up to 19 July 2026.
Matt Henry vs Rohit Sharma — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Matt Henry has scored 47 T20I runs in 43 matches at an average of 5.88. He has also taken 53 T20I wickets at an average of 23.08.
T20I career: Rohit Sharma has scored 4,231 T20I runs in 159 matches at an average of 32.05, with 5 centuries. He has also taken 1 T20I wickets at an average of 113.00 with an economy of 9.97.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rohit Sharma is the stronger pick with an average of 79 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Matt Henry or Rohit Sharma?
Matt Henry vs Rohit Sharma — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Matt Henry or Rohit Sharma?
What is the price difference between Matt Henry and Rohit Sharma?
How many MOTM awards have Matt Henry and Rohit Sharma won?
Should I pick Matt Henry or Rohit Sharma in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Matt Henry or Rohit Sharma?
Who has more ODI runs, Matt Henry or Rohit Sharma?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Matt Henry or Rohit Sharma?
Who has more Test runs, Matt Henry or Rohit Sharma?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Matt Henry or Rohit Sharma — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.