⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Michael Bracewell vs Shai Hope — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Shai Hope has the edge on the headline numbers: Shai Hope leads on T20I batting (1,743 runs, avg 30.1). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Michael Bracewell (Amsterdam Flames) has 434 T20I runs at avg 19.7 in 47 matches. Shai Hope (West Indies) has 1,743 T20I runs at avg 30.1 in 70 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Michael Bracewell vs Shai Hope — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Michael Bracewell | Shai Hope |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 18 | 18 |
| Avg fantasy points | 69 | 94 |
| Best fantasy score | 204 | 259 |
| Runs | 124 | 965 |
| Strike rate | 87.3 | 80.1 |
| Fours | 15 | 76 |
| Sixes | 1 | 28 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 4 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 5 |
| Highest score | 32 | 162 |
| Wickets | 28 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 5.44 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 5 | 0 |
| Catches | 5 | 14 |
| Total dismissals | 5 | 22 |
| Statistic | Michael Bracewell | Shai Hope |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 47 | 70 |
| Runs | 434 | 1743 |
| Batting average | 19.73 | 30.05 |
| Strike rate | 134.4 | — |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 2 | 12 |
| Wickets | 35 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 21.14 | — |
| Economy rate | 7.34 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Michael Bracewell has played 47 T20Is and Shai Hope 70. Michael Bracewell has 434 runs at 19.7 (strike rate 134.4), against 1,743 at 30.1 for Shai Hope, so Shai Hope has scored more. Hundreds: Michael Bracewell 0, Shai Hope 1. Fifties: 2 and 12. Michael Bracewell also bowls: 35 wickets at an economy of 7.34, while Shai Hope has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Michael Bracewell has played 48 ODIs and Shai Hope 158. Michael Bracewell has 1,042 runs at 35.9 (strike rate 107.5), against 6,590 at 51.5 for Shai Hope, so Shai Hope has scored more. Hundreds: Michael Bracewell 2, Shai Hope 21. Fifties: 3 and 32. Michael Bracewell also bowls: 46 wickets at an economy of 4.93, while Shai Hope has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Michael Bracewell has played 10 Tests and Shai Hope 49. Michael Bracewell has 339 runs at 21.2 (strike rate 57.1), against 2,518 at 28.0 (44.0) for Shai Hope, so Shai Hope has scored more. Hundreds: Michael Bracewell 0, Shai Hope 5. Fifties: 1 and 7. Michael Bracewell also bowls: 25 wickets at an economy of 3.60, while Shai Hope has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 2 August 2026.
Michael Bracewell vs Shai Hope — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Michael Bracewell has scored 434 T20I runs in 47 matches at an average of 19.73, with 2 half-centuries. He has also taken 35 T20I wickets at an average of 21.14 with an economy of 7.34.
T20I career: Shai Hope has scored 1,743 T20I runs in 70 matches at an average of 30.05, with 1 century.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shai Hope is the stronger pick with an average of 94 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Michael Bracewell or Shai Hope?
Michael Bracewell vs Shai Hope — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Michael Bracewell or Shai Hope?
What is the price difference between Michael Bracewell and Shai Hope?
How many MOTM awards have Michael Bracewell and Shai Hope won?
Should I pick Michael Bracewell or Shai Hope in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Michael Bracewell or Shai Hope?
Who has more ODI runs, Michael Bracewell or Shai Hope?
Who has more Test runs, Michael Bracewell or Shai Hope?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Michael Bracewell or Shai Hope — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.