⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Mitchell Marsh vs Mushfiqur Rahim — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Mitchell Marsh has the edge on the headline numbers: Mitchell Marsh leads on T20I batting (2,313 runs, avg 33.5). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Mitchell Marsh (Lucknow Super Giants) has 2,313 T20I runs at avg 33.5 in 88 matches. Mushfiqur Rahim (Bangladesh) has 1,500 T20I runs at avg 19.5 in 102 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Mitchell Marsh vs Mushfiqur Rahim — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Mitchell Marsh | Mushfiqur Rahim |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 4 |
| Avg fantasy points | 93 | 28 |
| Best fantasy score | 232 | 55 |
| Runs | 1022 | 81 |
| Strike rate | 160.7 | 48.5 |
| Fours | 98 | 11 |
| Sixes | 69 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 10 | 0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 111 | 43 |
| Catches | 4 | 1 |
| Total dismissals | 4 | 1 |
| Statistic | Mitchell Marsh | Mushfiqur Rahim |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 88 | 102 |
| Runs | 2313 | 1500 |
| Batting average | 33.52 | 19.48 |
| Strike rate | — | 114.9 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 14 | 6 |
| Wickets | 17 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 22.76 | — |
| Economy rate | 7.74 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Mitchell Marsh has played 88 T20Is and Mushfiqur Rahim 102. Mitchell Marsh has 2,313 runs at 33.5, against 1,500 at 19.5 (114.9) for Mushfiqur Rahim, so Mitchell Marsh has scored more. Hundreds: Mitchell Marsh 1, Mushfiqur Rahim 0. Fifties: 14 and 6. Mitchell Marsh also bowls: 17 wickets at an economy of 7.74, while Mushfiqur Rahim has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Mitchell Marsh has played 105 ODIs and Mushfiqur Rahim 274. Mitchell Marsh has 3,395 runs at 38.1, against 7,795 at 36.4 (79.8) for Mushfiqur Rahim, so Mushfiqur Rahim has scored more. Hundreds: Mitchell Marsh 4, Mushfiqur Rahim 9. Fifties: 24 and 49. Mitchell Marsh also bowls: 57 wickets at an economy of 5.50, while Mushfiqur Rahim has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Mitchell Marsh has played 46 Tests and Mushfiqur Rahim 105. Mitchell Marsh has 2,083 runs at 28.5 (strike rate 56.3), against 6,876 at 39.1 for Mushfiqur Rahim, so Mushfiqur Rahim has scored more. Hundreds: Mitchell Marsh 3, Mushfiqur Rahim 14. Fifties: 9 and 29. Mitchell Marsh also bowls: 51 wickets at an economy of 3.55, while Mushfiqur Rahim has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 22 August 2026.
Mitchell Marsh vs Mushfiqur Rahim — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Mitchell Marsh has scored 2,313 T20I runs in 88 matches at an average of 33.52, with 1 century. He has also taken 17 T20I wickets at an average of 22.76 with an economy of 7.74.
T20I career: Mushfiqur Rahim has scored 1,500 T20I runs in 102 matches at an average of 19.48, with 6 half-centuries.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Mitchell Marsh is the stronger pick with an average of 93 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Mitchell Marsh or Mushfiqur Rahim?
Mitchell Marsh vs Mushfiqur Rahim — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Mitchell Marsh or Mushfiqur Rahim?
What is the price difference between Mitchell Marsh and Mushfiqur Rahim?
How many MOTM awards have Mitchell Marsh and Mushfiqur Rahim won?
Should I pick Mitchell Marsh or Mushfiqur Rahim in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Mitchell Marsh or Mushfiqur Rahim?
Who has more ODI runs, Mitchell Marsh or Mushfiqur Rahim?
Who has more Test runs, Mitchell Marsh or Mushfiqur Rahim?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Mitchell Marsh or Mushfiqur Rahim — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.