⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Mitchell Santner vs Mushfiqur Rahim — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Mitchell Santner (New Zealand) has 1,087 T20I runs at avg 20.5 in 134 matches. Mushfiqur Rahim (Bangladesh) has 1,307 T20I runs at avg 19.5 in 90 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Mitchell Santner vs Mushfiqur Rahim — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Mitchell Santner | Mushfiqur Rahim |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 6 | 1 |
| Avg fantasy points | 50 | 53 |
| Best fantasy score | 79 | 53 |
| Runs | 43 | 43 |
| Strike rate | 95.6 | 51.8 |
| Fours | 3 | 6 |
| Sixes | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 21 | 43 |
| Wickets | 7 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 5.80 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 2 | 0 |
| Catches | 3 | 0 |
| Total dismissals | 4 | 0 |
| Statistic | Mitchell Santner | Mushfiqur Rahim |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 134 | 90 |
| Runs | 1087 | 1307 |
| Batting average | 20.51 | 19.51 |
| Strike rate | 130.7 | 115.2 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 2 | 6 |
| Wickets | 142 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 23.33 | — |
| Economy rate | 7.17 | — |
Mitchell Santner vs Mushfiqur Rahim — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Mitchell Santner has scored 1,087 T20I runs in 134 matches at an average of 20.51, with 2 half-centuries. He has also taken 142 T20I wickets at an average of 23.33 with an economy of 7.17.
T20I career: Mushfiqur Rahim has scored 1,307 T20I runs in 90 matches at an average of 19.51, with 6 half-centuries.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Mushfiqur Rahim is the stronger pick with an average of 53 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.