⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD

Mitchell Santner vs Nicholas PooranInternational Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison

Mitchell Santner (New Zealand) has 1,087 T20I runs at avg 20.5 in 134 matches. Nicholas Pooran (Lucknow Super Giants) has 2,177 T20I runs at avg 25.3 in 105 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.

Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form

TweetWhatsApp
PLAYER 1
🏏
Mitchell Santner
🇳🇿 NZ · 8.5 cr
VS
PLAYER 2
🏏
Nicholas Pooran
🦅 LSG · 10 cr
🏏
Mitchell Santner
🇳🇿 New Zealand
BOWL🌏 OS
8.5 cr
Credits
50
Avg Pts
79
Best FP
34.9
Pts/Cr
43
Total Runs
7
Total Wkts
🏏
Nicholas Pooran
🦅 Lucknow Super Giants
🧤 WK🌏 OS
10 cr
Credits
33
Avg Pts
134
Best FP
46.5
Pts/Cr
234
Total Runs
0
Total Wkts
⚠️These players are from different series — comparing all-time stats. For fairest comparison, pick two players from the same competition.
🔥 Clear Pick
🏏 Mitchell Santner
17 higher avg pts · 79 best fantasy score
🏏 Mitchell Santner
VS
🏏 Nicholas Pooran
T20I Career Overview
134Matches105
🏏 Batting
1087Runs2177
20.51Batting Avg25.31
130.65Strike Rate134.80
0Centuries0
2Half-Centuries12
42Sixes 🔴141
77*
Best Score
82
🎳 Bowling
142Wickets0
23.33Bowling Avg
7.17Economy Rate
05-Wkt Hauls0
4/11
Best Figures
Source: Cricsheet (cricsheet.org, CC BY 4.0) · International matches only

Mitchell Santner vs Nicholas Pooran — Stat Comparison Table

Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).

IPL season stats
StatisticMitchell SantnerNicholas Pooran
Matches614
Avg fantasy points5033
Best fantasy score79134
Runs43234
Strike rate95.6127.9
Fours311
Sixes119
Half-centuries (50+)01
Highest score2163
Wickets70
Economy rate5.800.00
Best spell (wkts)20
Catches35
Total dismissals46
International career — T20I
StatisticMitchell SantnerNicholas Pooran
Matches134105
Runs10872177
Batting average20.5125.31
Strike rate130.7134.8
Half-centuries (50+)212
Wickets1420
Bowling average23.33
Economy rate7.17
Stats updated
⚡ Strengths & Captaincy Pick
🏏 Mitchell Santner
More wickets
Higher avg fantasy pts
🏏 Nicholas Pooran
Superior run-scorer
Higher strike rate
More big-hitting sixes
👑 Captaincy Recommendation
C: 🏏 Mitchell Santner
50 avg pts · 79 best · 0 MOTM
VC: 🏏 Nicholas Pooran
Captaining Mitchell Santner gives you 2× pts. Always verify playing XI before locking.
📝 T20I Career Comparison

Mitchell Santner vs Nicholas PooranT20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.

T20I career: Mitchell Santner has scored 1,087 T20I runs in 134 matches at an average of 20.51, with 2 half-centuries. He has also taken 142 T20I wickets at an average of 23.33 with an economy of 7.17.

T20I career: Nicholas Pooran has scored 2,177 T20I runs in 105 matches at an average of 25.31, with 12 half-centuries.

Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Mitchell Santner is the stronger pick with an average of 50 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.

Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions
READY TO PLAY?
Pick Santner & Pooran in your fantasy XI
Free to play · No prize pool · Just bragging rights
Build XI →

Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.

CricketDreamCRICKETDREAM FANTASY
© 2026 CricketDream · Fantasy Cricket Platform · Built for cricket fans
Disclaimer: This platform is intended for users aged 18 years and above only. CricketDream is a free, skill-based fantasy cricket platform for entertainment purposes only. No monetary transactions or prizes are involved. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, licensed by, or sponsored by the BCCI, the IPL, any IPL franchise, or any other cricket governing body. All team names, player names, and logos are property of their respective owners.
⚽ ALSO INTO FOOTBALL?
Play Fantasy Football, Draft & Predictor — on FootballDream.in
🎯 Predictor📋 Team Draft👤 Player Draft
Play Now → footballdream.in