⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Mitchell Santner vs Nitish Kumar Reddy — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Mitchell Santner has the edge on the headline numbers: Mitchell Santner leads on T20I bowling (142 wickets, avg 23.3). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Mitchell Santner (Edinburgh Castle Rockers) has 1,108 T20I runs at avg 20.5 in 138 matches. Nitish Kumar Reddy (India) has 90 T20I runs in 4 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Mitchell Santner vs Nitish Kumar Reddy — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Mitchell Santner | Nitish Kumar Reddy |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 65 | 55 |
| Best fantasy score | 207 | 125 |
| Runs | 298 | 293 |
| Strike rate | 151.3 | 162.8 |
| Fours | 25 | 18 |
| Sixes | 12 | 20 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 1 | 1 |
| Highest score | 52 | 56 |
| Wickets | 18 | 16 |
| Economy rate | 6.70 | 9.08 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 5 | 3 |
| Catches | 8 | 13 |
| Total dismissals | 9 | 14 |
| Statistic | Mitchell Santner | Nitish Kumar Reddy |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 138 | 4 |
| Runs | 1108 | 90 |
| Batting average | 20.52 | — |
| Strike rate | 133.2 | — |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 2 | 1 |
| Wickets | 142 | 3 |
| Bowling average | 23.33 | 0.00 |
| Economy rate | 7.17 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Mitchell Santner has played 138 T20Is and Nitish Kumar Reddy 4. Mitchell Santner has 1,108 runs at 20.5 (strike rate 133.2), against 90 for Nitish Kumar Reddy, so Mitchell Santner has scored more. With the ball, Mitchell Santner has 142 wickets at an economy of 7.17 and Nitish Kumar Reddy 3; Mitchell Santner has more wickets.
ODI. Mitchell Santner has played 129 ODIs and Nitish Kumar Reddy 4. Mitchell Santner has 1,648 runs at 27.0 (strike rate 92.4), against 100 for Nitish Kumar Reddy, so Mitchell Santner has scored more. Mitchell Santner also bowls: 139 wickets, while Nitish Kumar Reddy has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Mitchell Santner has played 33 Tests and Nitish Kumar Reddy 10. Mitchell Santner has 1,089 runs at 24.8 (strike rate 47.0), against 396 for Nitish Kumar Reddy, so Mitchell Santner has scored more. Hundreds: Mitchell Santner 1, Nitish Kumar Reddy 1. Fifties: 4 and 0. With the ball, Mitchell Santner has 80 wickets at an economy of 2.86 and Nitish Kumar Reddy 8; Mitchell Santner has more wickets.
International numbers up to 21 July 2026.
Mitchell Santner vs Nitish Kumar Reddy — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Mitchell Santner has scored 1,108 T20I runs in 138 matches at an average of 20.52, with 2 half-centuries. He has also taken 142 T20I wickets at an average of 23.33 with an economy of 7.17.
T20I career: He has also taken 3 T20I wickets.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Mitchell Santner is the stronger pick with an average of 65 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Mitchell Santner or Nitish Kumar Reddy?
Mitchell Santner vs Nitish Kumar Reddy — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Mitchell Santner or Nitish Kumar Reddy?
What is the price difference between Mitchell Santner and Nitish Kumar Reddy?
How many MOTM awards have Mitchell Santner and Nitish Kumar Reddy won?
Should I pick Mitchell Santner or Nitish Kumar Reddy in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Mitchell Santner or Nitish Kumar Reddy?
Who has more ODI runs, Mitchell Santner or Nitish Kumar Reddy?
Who has more Test runs, Mitchell Santner or Nitish Kumar Reddy?
Who has taken more Test wickets, Mitchell Santner or Nitish Kumar Reddy?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Mitchell Santner or Nitish Kumar Reddy — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.