⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Mitchell Santner vs Rishabh Pant — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rishabh Pant has the edge on the headline numbers: Rishabh Pant leads on T20I batting (1,209 runs, avg 23.3). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Mitchell Santner (Edinburgh Castle Rockers) has 1,108 T20I runs at avg 20.5 in 138 matches. Rishabh Pant (Lucknow Super Giants) has 1,209 T20I runs at avg 23.3 in 76 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Mitchell Santner vs Rishabh Pant — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Mitchell Santner | Rishabh Pant |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 17 |
| Avg fantasy points | 65 | 62 |
| Best fantasy score | 207 | 197 |
| Runs | 298 | 561 |
| Strike rate | 151.3 | 98.9 |
| Fours | 25 | 54 |
| Sixes | 12 | 19 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 1 | 3 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Highest score | 52 | 105 |
| Wickets | 18 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 6.70 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 5 | 0 |
| Catches | 8 | 15 |
| Total dismissals | 9 | 20 |
| Statistic | Mitchell Santner | Rishabh Pant |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 138 | 76 |
| Runs | 1108 | 1209 |
| Batting average | 20.52 | 23.25 |
| Strike rate | 133.2 | — |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 2 | 3 |
| Wickets | 142 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 23.33 | — |
| Economy rate | 7.17 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Mitchell Santner has played 138 T20Is and Rishabh Pant 76. Mitchell Santner has 1,108 runs at 20.5 (strike rate 133.2), against 1,209 at 23.3 for Rishabh Pant, so Rishabh Pant has scored more. Mitchell Santner also bowls: 142 wickets at an economy of 7.17, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Mitchell Santner has played 129 ODIs and Rishabh Pant 31. Mitchell Santner has 1,648 runs at 27.0 (strike rate 92.4), against 871 at 33.5 (106.2) for Rishabh Pant, so Mitchell Santner has scored more. Hundreds: Mitchell Santner 0, Rishabh Pant 1. Fifties: 3 and 5. Mitchell Santner also bowls: 139 wickets, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Mitchell Santner has played 33 Tests and Rishabh Pant 51. Mitchell Santner has 1,089 runs at 24.8 (strike rate 47.0), against 3,644 at 43.4 (74.3) for Rishabh Pant, so Rishabh Pant has scored more. Hundreds: Mitchell Santner 1, Rishabh Pant 8. Fifties: 4 and 20. Mitchell Santner also bowls: 80 wickets at an economy of 2.86, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 23 August 2026.
Mitchell Santner vs Rishabh Pant — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Mitchell Santner has scored 1,108 T20I runs in 138 matches at an average of 20.52, with 2 half-centuries. He has also taken 142 T20I wickets at an average of 23.33 with an economy of 7.17.
T20I career: Rishabh Pant has scored 1,209 T20I runs in 76 matches at an average of 23.25, with 3 half-centuries.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Mitchell Santner is the stronger pick with an average of 65 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Mitchell Santner or Rishabh Pant?
Mitchell Santner vs Rishabh Pant — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Mitchell Santner or Rishabh Pant?
What is the price difference between Mitchell Santner and Rishabh Pant?
How many MOTM awards have Mitchell Santner and Rishabh Pant won?
Should I pick Mitchell Santner or Rishabh Pant in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Mitchell Santner or Rishabh Pant?
Who has more ODI runs, Mitchell Santner or Rishabh Pant?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has more Test runs, Mitchell Santner or Rishabh Pant?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Mitchell Santner or Rishabh Pant — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.