⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Mitchell Santner vs Tim Seifert — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Mitchell Santner (New Zealand) has 1,087 T20I runs at avg 20.5 in 134 matches. Tim Seifert (Kolkata Knight Riders) has 2,228 T20I runs at avg 30.1 in 88 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Mitchell Santner vs Tim Seifert — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Mitchell Santner | Tim Seifert |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 6 | 3 |
| Avg fantasy points | 50 | 28 |
| Best fantasy score | 79 | 42 |
| Runs | 43 | 19 |
| Strike rate | 95.6 | 105.6 |
| Fours | 3 | 2 |
| Sixes | 1 | 1 |
| Highest score | 21 | 19 |
| Wickets | 7 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 5.80 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 2 | 0 |
| Catches | 3 | 2 |
| Total dismissals | 4 | 4 |
| Statistic | Mitchell Santner | Tim Seifert |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 134 | 88 |
| Runs | 1087 | 2228 |
| Batting average | 20.51 | 30.11 |
| Strike rate | 130.7 | 146.3 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 2 | 16 |
| Wickets | 142 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 23.33 | — |
| Economy rate | 7.17 | — |
Mitchell Santner vs Tim Seifert — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Mitchell Santner has scored 1,087 T20I runs in 134 matches at an average of 20.51, with 2 half-centuries. He has also taken 142 T20I wickets at an average of 23.33 with an economy of 7.17.
T20I career: Tim Seifert has scored 2,228 T20I runs in 88 matches at an average of 30.11, with 16 half-centuries.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Mitchell Santner is the stronger pick with an average of 50 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.