⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Mitchell Swepson vs Virat Kohli: Who Is Better? International Stats Comparison
Mitchell Swepson has the edge on the headline numbers: Mitchell Swepson leads on T20I bowling (11 wickets). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Mitchell Swepson () has 32 T20I runs in 8 matches. Virat Kohli (India) has 4,188 T20I runs at avg 48.7 in 125 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Mitchell Swepson vs Virat Kohli — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Mitchell Swepson | Virat Kohli |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 0 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 0 | 81 |
| Best fantasy score | 0 | 211 |
| Runs | 0 | 890 |
| Strike rate | 0.0 | 150.6 |
| Fours | 0 | 92 |
| Sixes | 0 | 32 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 2 |
| Highest score | 0 | 139 |
| Catches | 0 | 10 |
| Total dismissals | 0 | 11 |
| Statistic | Mitchell Swepson | Virat Kohli |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 8 | 125 |
| Runs | 32 | 4188 |
| Batting average | — | 48.70 |
| Strike rate | — | 137.0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 38 |
| Wickets | 11 | 4 |
| Bowling average | 0.00 | 51.00 |
| Economy rate | — | 8.05 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Mitchell Swepson has played 8 T20Is and Virat Kohli 125. Mitchell Swepson has 32 runs, against 4,188 at 48.7 (137.0) for Virat Kohli, so Virat Kohli has scored more. Hundreds: Mitchell Swepson 0, Virat Kohli 1. Fifties: 0 and 38. With the ball, Mitchell Swepson has 11 wickets and Virat Kohli 4 at 8.05; Mitchell Swepson has more wickets.
ODI. Mitchell Swepson has played 3 ODIs and Virat Kohli 315. Mitchell Swepson has 2 runs, against 15,080 at 59.1 (95.5) for Virat Kohli, so Virat Kohli has scored more. Hundreds: Mitchell Swepson 0, Virat Kohli 55. Fifties: 0 and 79. With the ball, Mitchell Swepson has 3 wickets and Virat Kohli 5 at 6.16; Virat Kohli has more wickets.
Test. Mitchell Swepson has played 4 Tests and Virat Kohli 123. Mitchell Swepson has 28 runs, against 9,230 at 46.9 (55.6) for Virat Kohli, so Virat Kohli has scored more. Hundreds: Mitchell Swepson 0, Virat Kohli 30. Fifties: 0 and 31. Mitchell Swepson also bowls: 10 wickets, while Virat Kohli has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 19 July 2026.
What is happening now
Most ODI centuries in history and a 2026 IPL champion with Bengaluru
IPL 2026: 675 runs at a strike rate of 165.9 in 16 innings. Royal Challengers Bengaluru beat Gujarat Titans by six wickets in the final at Ahmedabad.
Full Kohli profile →Mitchell Swepson vs Virat Kohli — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: He has also taken 11 T20I wickets.
T20I career: Virat Kohli has scored 4,188 T20I runs in 125 matches at an average of 48.70, with 1 century. He has also taken 4 T20I wickets at an average of 51.00 with an economy of 8.05.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Virat Kohli is the stronger pick with an average of 81 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Mitchell Swepson or Virat Kohli?
Mitchell Swepson vs Virat Kohli — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Mitchell Swepson or Virat Kohli?
What is the price difference between Mitchell Swepson and Virat Kohli?
How many MOTM awards have Mitchell Swepson and Virat Kohli won?
Should I pick Mitchell Swepson or Virat Kohli in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Mitchell Swepson or Virat Kohli?
Who has more ODI runs, Mitchell Swepson or Virat Kohli?
Who has more Test runs, Mitchell Swepson or Virat Kohli?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Mitchell Swepson or Virat Kohli — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.