⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Mohammad Hafeez vs Shubman Gill — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Shubman Gill has the edge on the headline numbers: Shubman Gill leads on T20I batting (869 runs, avg 28.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Mohammad Hafeez (Kolkata Knight Riders) has 2,514 T20I runs at avg 26.5 in 119 matches. Shubman Gill (India) has 869 T20I runs at avg 28.0 in 36 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Mohammad Hafeez vs Shubman Gill — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Mohammad Hafeez | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 0 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 0 | 109 |
| Best fantasy score | 0 | 329 |
| Runs | 0 | 1288 |
| Strike rate | 0.0 | 113.5 |
| Fours | 0 | 163 |
| Sixes | 0 | 29 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 5 |
| Highest score | 0 | 223 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 4.00 |
| Catches | 0 | 12 |
| Total dismissals | 0 | 15 |
| Statistic | Mohammad Hafeez | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 119 | 36 |
| Runs | 2514 | 869 |
| Batting average | 26.46 | 28.03 |
| Strike rate | 122.0 | — |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 14 | 3 |
| Wickets | 61 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 22.75 | — |
| Economy rate | 6.60 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Mohammad Hafeez has played 119 T20Is and Shubman Gill 36. Mohammad Hafeez has 2,514 runs at 26.5 (strike rate 122.0), against 869 at 28.0 for Shubman Gill, so Mohammad Hafeez has scored more. Hundreds: Mohammad Hafeez 0, Shubman Gill 1. Fifties: 14 and 3. Mohammad Hafeez also bowls: 61 wickets at an economy of 6.60, while Shubman Gill has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Mohammad Hafeez has played 218 ODIs and Shubman Gill 70. Mohammad Hafeez has 6,614 runs at 32.9 (strike rate 76.6), against 3,713 at 64.0 for Shubman Gill, so Mohammad Hafeez has scored more. Hundreds: Mohammad Hafeez 11, Shubman Gill 11. Fifties: 38 and 20. Mohammad Hafeez also bowls: 139 wickets at an economy of 4.19, while Shubman Gill has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Mohammad Hafeez has played 55 Tests and Shubman Gill 43. Mohammad Hafeez has 3,652 runs at 37.6 (strike rate 56.0), against 3,043 at 43.5 for Shubman Gill, so Mohammad Hafeez has scored more. Hundreds: Mohammad Hafeez 10, Shubman Gill 11. Fifties: 12 and 8. Mohammad Hafeez also bowls: 53 wickets at an economy of 2.67, while Shubman Gill has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 23 August 2026.
Mohammad Hafeez vs Shubman Gill — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Mohammad Hafeez has scored 2,514 T20I runs in 119 matches at an average of 26.46, with 14 half-centuries. He has also taken 61 T20I wickets at an average of 22.75 with an economy of 6.60.
T20I career: Shubman Gill has scored 869 T20I runs in 36 matches at an average of 28.03, with 1 century.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shubman Gill is the stronger pick with an average of 109 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Mohammad Hafeez or Shubman Gill?
Mohammad Hafeez vs Shubman Gill — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Mohammad Hafeez or Shubman Gill?
What is the price difference between Mohammad Hafeez and Shubman Gill?
How many MOTM awards have Mohammad Hafeez and Shubman Gill won?
Should I pick Mohammad Hafeez or Shubman Gill in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Mohammad Hafeez or Shubman Gill?
Who has more ODI runs, Mohammad Hafeez or Shubman Gill?
Who has more Test runs, Mohammad Hafeez or Shubman Gill?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Mohammad Hafeez or Shubman Gill — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.