⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Nandan Yadav vs Shubman Gill — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Nandan Yadav has the edge on the headline numbers: Nandan Yadav leads on T20I bowling (22 wickets). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Nandan Yadav () has 81 T20I runs in 19 matches. Shubman Gill (India) has 846 T20I runs at avg 28.2 in 35 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Nandan Yadav vs Shubman Gill — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Nandan Yadav | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 0 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 0 | 95 |
| Best fantasy score | 0 | 244 |
| Runs | 0 | 1076 |
| Strike rate | 0.0 | 111.2 |
| Fours | 0 | 132 |
| Sixes | 0 | 28 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 7 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 3 |
| Highest score | 0 | 154 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 4.00 |
| Catches | 0 | 12 |
| Total dismissals | 0 | 15 |
| Statistic | Nandan Yadav | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 19 | 35 |
| Runs | 81 | 846 |
| Batting average | — | 28.20 |
| Strike rate | — | 137.6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 3 |
| Wickets | 22 | 0 |
Nandan Yadav vs Shubman Gill — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: He has also taken 22 T20I wickets.
T20I career: Shubman Gill has scored 846 T20I runs in 35 matches at an average of 28.20, with 1 century.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shubman Gill is the stronger pick with an average of 95 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Nandan Yadav or Shubman Gill — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.