⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Neil McKenzie vs Rishabh Pant: Who Is Better? International Stats Comparison
Rishabh Pant has the edge on the headline numbers: Rishabh Pant leads on T20I batting (1,209 runs, avg 23.3). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Neil McKenzie () has 7 T20I runs in 2 matches. Rishabh Pant (Lucknow Super Giants) has 1,209 T20I runs at avg 23.3 in 76 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Neil McKenzie vs Rishabh Pant · Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Neil McKenzie | Rishabh Pant |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 0 | 17 |
| Avg fantasy points | 0 | 62 |
| Best fantasy score | 0 | 197 |
| Runs | 0 | 561 |
| Strike rate | 0.0 | 98.9 |
| Fours | 0 | 54 |
| Sixes | 0 | 19 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 3 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Highest score | 0 | 105 |
| Catches | 0 | 15 |
| Total dismissals | 0 | 20 |
| Statistic | Neil McKenzie | Rishabh Pant |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 2 | 76 |
| Runs | 7 | 1209 |
| Batting average | — | 23.25 |
| Strike rate | 87.5 | — |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 3 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Neil McKenzie has played 2 T20Is and Rishabh Pant 76. Neil McKenzie has 7 runs (strike rate 87.5), against 1,209 at 23.3 for Rishabh Pant, so Rishabh Pant has scored more.
ODI. Neil McKenzie has played 64 ODIs and Rishabh Pant 31. Neil McKenzie has 1,688 runs at 37.5 (strike rate 69.4), against 871 at 33.5 (106.2) for Rishabh Pant, so Neil McKenzie has scored more. Hundreds: Neil McKenzie 2, Rishabh Pant 1. Fifties: 10 and 5.
Test. Neil McKenzie has played 58 Tests and Rishabh Pant 51. Neil McKenzie has 3,253 runs at 37.4 (strike rate 42.0), against 3,644 at 43.4 (74.3) for Rishabh Pant, so Rishabh Pant has scored more. Hundreds: Neil McKenzie 5, Rishabh Pant 8. Fifties: 16 and 20.
International numbers up to 23 August 2026.
Did you know: Rishabh Pant
- His 89 not out at the Gabba in January 2021 sealed a series win in a ground where Australia had not lost a Test since 1988.
- In June 2025 at Headingley he became the first Indian to score centuries in both innings of a Test in England, and only the second wicketkeeper after Andy Flower to do it anywhere.
- He holds the record for the most Test sixes by an Indian batter.
- Lucknow Super Giants bought him for ₹27 crore at the 2025 auction, the highest price in IPL history.
🧠Quick quiz: Neil McKenzie and Rishabh Pant
2 questions, answers explained. No sign-up needed.
- 1. At which ground did Pant's 89 not out win a Test in January 2021?
- 2. What did Pant do at Headingley in June 2025?
Neil McKenzie vs Rishabh Pant · T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Neil McKenzie has scored 7 T20I runs in 2 matches.
T20I career: Rishabh Pant has scored 1,209 T20I runs in 76 matches at an average of 23.25, with 3 half-centuries.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rishabh Pant is the stronger pick with an average of 62 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats, Neil McKenzie or Rishabh Pant?
Neil McKenzie vs Rishabh Pant: who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate, Neil McKenzie or Rishabh Pant?
What is the price difference between Neil McKenzie and Rishabh Pant?
How many MOTM awards have Neil McKenzie and Rishabh Pant won?
Should I pick Neil McKenzie or Rishabh Pant in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Neil McKenzie or Rishabh Pant?
Who has more ODI runs, Neil McKenzie or Rishabh Pant?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has more Test runs, Neil McKenzie or Rishabh Pant?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side, Neil McKenzie or Rishabh Pant, and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.