⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Paul Collingwood vs Shubman Gill — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Shubman Gill has the edge on the headline numbers: Shubman Gill leads on T20I batting (869 runs, avg 28.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Paul Collingwood (Delhi Capitals) has 583 T20I runs at avg 18.8 in 36 matches. Shubman Gill (India) has 869 T20I runs at avg 28.0 in 36 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Paul Collingwood vs Shubman Gill — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Paul Collingwood | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 0 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 0 | 109 |
| Best fantasy score | 0 | 329 |
| Runs | 0 | 1288 |
| Strike rate | 0.0 | 113.5 |
| Fours | 0 | 163 |
| Sixes | 0 | 29 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 5 |
| Highest score | 0 | 223 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 4.00 |
| Catches | 0 | 12 |
| Total dismissals | 0 | 15 |
| Statistic | Paul Collingwood | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 36 | 36 |
| Runs | 583 | 869 |
| Batting average | 18.81 | 28.03 |
| Strike rate | 127.0 | — |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 3 |
| Wickets | 16 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 21.69 | — |
| Economy rate | 8.90 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Paul Collingwood has played 36 T20Is and Shubman Gill 36. Paul Collingwood has 583 runs at 18.8 (strike rate 127.0), against 869 at 28.0 for Shubman Gill, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Paul Collingwood 0, Shubman Gill 1. Fifties: 3 and 3. Paul Collingwood also bowls: 16 wickets at an economy of 8.90, while Shubman Gill has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Paul Collingwood has played 197 ODIs and Shubman Gill 70. Paul Collingwood has 5,078 runs at 35.5 (strike rate 76.8), against 3,713 at 64.0 for Shubman Gill, so Paul Collingwood has scored more. Hundreds: Paul Collingwood 5, Shubman Gill 11. Fifties: 26 and 20. Paul Collingwood also bowls: 111 wickets at an economy of 4.97, while Shubman Gill has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Paul Collingwood has played 68 Tests and Shubman Gill 43. Paul Collingwood has 4,259 runs at 40.6 (strike rate 46.4), against 3,043 at 43.5 for Shubman Gill, so Paul Collingwood has scored more. Hundreds: Paul Collingwood 10, Shubman Gill 11. Fifties: 20 and 8. Paul Collingwood also bowls: 17 wickets at an economy of 3.21, while Shubman Gill has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 23 August 2026.
Paul Collingwood vs Shubman Gill — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Paul Collingwood has scored 583 T20I runs in 36 matches at an average of 18.81, with 3 half-centuries. He has also taken 16 T20I wickets at an average of 21.69 with an economy of 8.90.
T20I career: Shubman Gill has scored 869 T20I runs in 36 matches at an average of 28.03, with 1 century.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shubman Gill is the stronger pick with an average of 109 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Paul Collingwood or Shubman Gill?
Paul Collingwood vs Shubman Gill — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Paul Collingwood or Shubman Gill?
What is the price difference between Paul Collingwood and Shubman Gill?
How many MOTM awards have Paul Collingwood and Shubman Gill won?
Should I pick Paul Collingwood or Shubman Gill in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Paul Collingwood or Shubman Gill?
Who has more ODI runs, Paul Collingwood or Shubman Gill?
Who has more Test runs, Paul Collingwood or Shubman Gill?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Paul Collingwood or Shubman Gill — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.