⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Pooja Vastrakar vs Shubman Gill — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Pooja Vastrakar (India Women) has 1,050 T20I runs at avg 45.6 in 61 matches. Shubman Gill (India) has 1,881 T20I runs at avg 26.9 in 89 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Pooja Vastrakar vs Shubman Gill — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Pooja Vastrakar | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 0 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 0 | 101 |
| Best fantasy score | 0 | 244 |
| Runs | 0 | 1096 |
| Strike rate | 0.0 | 136.7 |
| Fours | 0 | 122 |
| Sixes | 0 | 38 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 7 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 3 |
| Highest score | 0 | 154 |
| Catches | 0 | 14 |
| Total dismissals | 0 | 17 |
| Statistic | Pooja Vastrakar | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 61 | 89 |
| Runs | 1050 | 1881 |
| Batting average | 45.65 | 26.87 |
| Strike rate | 362.1 | 119.2 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 6 |
| Wickets | 62 | 37 |
| Bowling average | 20.03 | 17.11 |
| Economy rate | 6.39 | 5.85 |
| Five-wicket hauls | 0 | 1 |
Pooja Vastrakar vs Shubman Gill — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Pooja Vastrakar has scored 1,050 T20I runs in 61 matches at an average of 45.65. She has also taken 62 T20I wickets at an average of 20.03 with an economy of 6.39.
T20I career: Shubman Gill has scored 1,881 T20I runs in 89 matches at an average of 26.87, with 1 century. He has also taken 37 T20I wickets at an average of 17.11 with an economy of 5.85.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shubman Gill is the stronger pick with an average of 101 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.