⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Rachin Ravindra vs Shubman Gill — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Shubman Gill has the edge on the headline numbers: Shubman Gill leads on T20I batting (869 runs, avg 28.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Rachin Ravindra (Kolkata Knight Riders) has 759 T20I runs at avg 20.5 in 52 matches. Shubman Gill (India) has 869 T20I runs at avg 28.0 in 36 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Rachin Ravindra vs Shubman Gill — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Rachin Ravindra | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 11 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 73 | 109 |
| Best fantasy score | 204 | 329 |
| Runs | 388 | 1288 |
| Strike rate | 87.2 | 113.5 |
| Fours | 47 | 163 |
| Sixes | 8 | 29 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 1 | 6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 2 | 5 |
| Highest score | 109 | 223 |
| Wickets | 6 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 7.78 | 4.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 2 | 0 |
| Catches | 5 | 12 |
| Total dismissals | 6 | 15 |
| Statistic | Rachin Ravindra | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 52 | 36 |
| Runs | 759 | 869 |
| Batting average | 20.51 | 28.03 |
| Strike rate | 135.5 | — |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 3 |
| Wickets | 26 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 16.92 | — |
| Economy rate | 6.88 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Rachin Ravindra has played 52 T20Is and Shubman Gill 36. Rachin Ravindra has 759 runs at 20.5 (strike rate 135.5), against 869 at 28.0 for Shubman Gill, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Rachin Ravindra 0, Shubman Gill 1. Fifties: 3 and 3. Rachin Ravindra also bowls: 26 wickets at an economy of 6.88, while Shubman Gill has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Rachin Ravindra has played 39 ODIs and Shubman Gill 70. Rachin Ravindra has 1,424 runs at 41.9, against 3,713 at 64.0 for Shubman Gill, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Rachin Ravindra 5, Shubman Gill 11. Fifties: 6 and 20. Rachin Ravindra also bowls: 21 wickets at an economy of 5.80, while Shubman Gill has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Rachin Ravindra has played 24 Tests and Shubman Gill 43. Rachin Ravindra has 1,865 runs at 47.8 (strike rate 64.3), against 3,043 at 43.5 for Shubman Gill, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Rachin Ravindra 5, Shubman Gill 11. Fifties: 7 and 8. Rachin Ravindra also bowls: 11 wickets at an economy of 3.01, while Shubman Gill has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 23 August 2026.
Rachin Ravindra vs Shubman Gill — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Rachin Ravindra has scored 759 T20I runs in 52 matches at an average of 20.51, with 3 half-centuries. He has also taken 26 T20I wickets at an average of 16.92 with an economy of 6.88.
T20I career: Shubman Gill has scored 869 T20I runs in 36 matches at an average of 28.03, with 1 century.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shubman Gill is the stronger pick with an average of 109 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Rachin Ravindra or Shubman Gill?
Rachin Ravindra vs Shubman Gill — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Rachin Ravindra or Shubman Gill?
What is the price difference between Rachin Ravindra and Shubman Gill?
How many MOTM awards have Rachin Ravindra and Shubman Gill won?
Should I pick Rachin Ravindra or Shubman Gill in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Rachin Ravindra or Shubman Gill?
Who has more ODI runs, Rachin Ravindra or Shubman Gill?
Who has more Test runs, Rachin Ravindra or Shubman Gill?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Rachin Ravindra or Shubman Gill — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.