⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Rashid Khan vs Virat Kohli — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Virat Kohli has the edge on the headline numbers: Virat Kohli leads on T20I batting (4,188 runs, avg 48.7). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Rashid Khan (Gujarat Titans) has 622 T20I runs at avg 14.8 in 115 matches. Virat Kohli (India) has 4,188 T20I runs at avg 48.7 in 125 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Rashid Khan vs Virat Kohli — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Rashid Khan | Virat Kohli |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 70 | 81 |
| Best fantasy score | 203 | 211 |
| Runs | 148 | 890 |
| Strike rate | 98.0 | 150.6 |
| Fours | 14 | 92 |
| Sixes | 4 | 32 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 2 |
| Highest score | 37 | 139 |
| Wickets | 32 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 7.22 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 6 | 0 |
| Catches | 11 | 10 |
| Total dismissals | 13 | 11 |
| Statistic | Rashid Khan | Virat Kohli |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 115 | 125 |
| Runs | 622 | 4188 |
| Batting average | 14.81 | 48.70 |
| Strike rate | — | 137.0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 38 |
| Wickets | 193 | 4 |
| Bowling average | 13.73 | 51.00 |
| Economy rate | — | 8.05 |
| Five-wicket hauls | 2 | 0 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Rashid Khan has played 115 T20Is and Virat Kohli 125. Rashid Khan has 622 runs at 14.8, against 4,188 at 48.7 (137.0) for Virat Kohli, so Virat Kohli has scored more. Hundreds: Rashid Khan 0, Virat Kohli 1. Fifties: 0 and 38. With the ball, Rashid Khan has 193 wickets and Virat Kohli 4 at 8.05; Rashid Khan has more wickets.
ODI. Rashid Khan has played 123 ODIs and Virat Kohli 315. Rashid Khan has 1,469 runs at 18.8, against 15,080 at 59.1 (95.5) for Virat Kohli, so Virat Kohli has scored more. Hundreds: Rashid Khan 0, Virat Kohli 55. Fifties: 5 and 79. With the ball, Rashid Khan has 226 wickets and Virat Kohli 5 at 6.16; Rashid Khan has more wickets.
Test. Rashid Khan has played 6 Tests and Virat Kohli 123. Rashid Khan has 154 runs at 17.1 (strike rate 85.6), against 9,230 at 46.9 (55.6) for Virat Kohli, so Virat Kohli has scored more. Hundreds: Rashid Khan 0, Virat Kohli 30. Fifties: 1 and 31. Rashid Khan also bowls: 45 wickets at an economy of 2.96, while Virat Kohli has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 19 July 2026.
Rashid Khan vs Virat Kohli — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Rashid Khan has scored 622 T20I runs in 115 matches at an average of 14.81. He has also taken 193 T20I wickets at an average of 13.73.
T20I career: Virat Kohli has scored 4,188 T20I runs in 125 matches at an average of 48.70, with 1 century. He has also taken 4 T20I wickets at an average of 51.00 with an economy of 8.05.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Virat Kohli is the stronger pick with an average of 81 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Rashid Khan or Virat Kohli?
Rashid Khan vs Virat Kohli — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Rashid Khan or Virat Kohli?
What is the price difference between Rashid Khan and Virat Kohli?
How many MOTM awards have Rashid Khan and Virat Kohli won?
Should I pick Rashid Khan or Virat Kohli in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Rashid Khan or Virat Kohli?
Who has more ODI runs, Rashid Khan or Virat Kohli?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Rashid Khan or Virat Kohli?
Who has more Test runs, Rashid Khan or Virat Kohli?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Rashid Khan or Virat Kohli — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.