⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Ravindra Jadeja vs Shubman Gill — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Shubman Gill has the edge on the headline numbers: Shubman Gill leads on T20I batting (869 runs, avg 28.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Ravindra Jadeja (Rajasthan Royals) has 515 T20I runs at avg 21.5 in 74 matches. Shubman Gill (India) has 869 T20I runs at avg 28.0 in 36 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Ravindra Jadeja vs Shubman Gill — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Ravindra Jadeja | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 17 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 64 | 109 |
| Best fantasy score | 176 | 329 |
| Runs | 331 | 1288 |
| Strike rate | 102.2 | 113.5 |
| Fours | 29 | 163 |
| Sixes | 5 | 29 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 5 |
| Highest score | 45 | 223 |
| Wickets | 20 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 4.17 | 4.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 4 | 0 |
| Catches | 4 | 12 |
| Total dismissals | 4 | 15 |
| Statistic | Ravindra Jadeja | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 74 | 36 |
| Runs | 515 | 869 |
| Batting average | 21.46 | 28.03 |
| Strike rate | 127.2 | — |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 3 |
| Wickets | 54 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 29.85 | — |
| Economy rate | 7.13 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Ravindra Jadeja has played 74 T20Is and Shubman Gill 36. Ravindra Jadeja has 515 runs at 21.5 (strike rate 127.2), against 869 at 28.0 for Shubman Gill, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Ravindra Jadeja 0, Shubman Gill 1. Fifties: 0 and 3. Ravindra Jadeja also bowls: 54 wickets at an economy of 7.13, while Shubman Gill has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Ravindra Jadeja has played 210 ODIs and Shubman Gill 70. Ravindra Jadeja has 2,905 runs at 32.3 (strike rate 86.4), against 3,713 at 64.0 for Shubman Gill, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Ravindra Jadeja 0, Shubman Gill 11. Fifties: 13 and 20. Ravindra Jadeja also bowls: 232 wickets, while Shubman Gill has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Ravindra Jadeja has played 90 Tests and Shubman Gill 43. Ravindra Jadeja has 4,140 runs at 38.0 (strike rate 55.3), against 3,043 at 43.5 for Shubman Gill, so Ravindra Jadeja has scored more. Hundreds: Ravindra Jadeja 6, Shubman Gill 11. Fifties: 28 and 8. Ravindra Jadeja also bowls: 350 wickets at an economy of 2.59, while Shubman Gill has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 23 August 2026.
Ravindra Jadeja vs Shubman Gill — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Ravindra Jadeja has scored 515 T20I runs in 74 matches at an average of 21.46. He has also taken 54 T20I wickets at an average of 29.85 with an economy of 7.13.
T20I career: Shubman Gill has scored 869 T20I runs in 36 matches at an average of 28.03, with 1 century.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shubman Gill is the stronger pick with an average of 109 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Ravindra Jadeja or Shubman Gill?
Ravindra Jadeja vs Shubman Gill — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Ravindra Jadeja or Shubman Gill?
What is the price difference between Ravindra Jadeja and Shubman Gill?
How many MOTM awards have Ravindra Jadeja and Shubman Gill won?
Should I pick Ravindra Jadeja or Shubman Gill in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Ravindra Jadeja or Shubman Gill?
Who has more ODI runs, Ravindra Jadeja or Shubman Gill?
Who has more Test runs, Ravindra Jadeja or Shubman Gill?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Ravindra Jadeja or Shubman Gill — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.