⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Renuka Singh vs Rohit Sharma — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rohit Sharma has the edge on the headline numbers: Rohit Sharma leads on T20I batting (4,231 runs, avg 32.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Renuka Singh (India Women) has 13 T20I runs at avg 4.3 in 65 matches. Rohit Sharma (India) has 4,231 T20I runs at avg 32.0 in 159 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Renuka Singh vs Rohit Sharma — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Renuka Singh | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 2 | 19 |
| Avg fantasy points | 39 | 79 |
| Best fantasy score | 49 | 214 |
| Runs | 0 | 885 |
| Strike rate | 0.0 | 126.2 |
| Fours | 0 | 85 |
| Sixes | 0 | 49 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 5 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 2 |
| Highest score | 0 | 138 |
| Wickets | 2 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 8.86 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 1 | 0 |
| Catches | 1 | 9 |
| Total dismissals | 1 | 9 |
| Statistic | Renuka Singh | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 65 | 159 |
| Runs | 13 | 4231 |
| Batting average | 4.33 | 32.05 |
| Strike rate | 86.7 | 140.9 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 5 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 32 |
| Wickets | 71 | 1 |
| Bowling average | 22.41 | 113.00 |
| Economy rate | 6.68 | 9.97 |
| Five-wicket hauls | 1 | 0 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Renuka Singh has played 65 T20Is and Rohit Sharma 159. Renuka Singh has 13 runs at 4.3 (strike rate 86.7), against 4,231 at 32.0 (140.9) for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Renuka Singh 0, Rohit Sharma 5. Fifties: 0 and 32. With the ball, Renuka Singh has 71 wickets at an economy of 6.68 and Rohit Sharma 1 at 9.97; Renuka Singh has more wickets.
ODI. Renuka Singh has played 29 ODIs and Rohit Sharma 291. Renuka Singh has 21 runs at 2.3 (strike rate 37.5), against 12,120 at 49.3 for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Renuka Singh 0, Rohit Sharma 35. Fifties: 0 and 63. With the ball, Renuka Singh has 42 wickets at an economy of 4.92 and Rohit Sharma 9 at 5.24; Renuka Singh has more wickets.
Test. Renuka Singh has played 3 Tests and Rohit Sharma 67. Renuka Singh has 9 runs at 4.5 (strike rate 56.3), against 4,301 at 40.6 (57.1) for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Renuka Singh 0, Rohit Sharma 12. Fifties: 0 and 18.
International numbers up to 19 July 2026.
Renuka Singh vs Rohit Sharma — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Renuka Singh has scored 13 T20I runs in 65 matches at an average of 4.33. She has also taken 71 T20I wickets at an average of 22.41 with an economy of 6.68.
T20I career: Rohit Sharma has scored 4,231 T20I runs in 159 matches at an average of 32.05, with 5 centuries. He has also taken 1 T20I wickets at an average of 113.00 with an economy of 9.97.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rohit Sharma is the stronger pick with an average of 79 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Renuka Singh or Rohit Sharma?
Renuka Singh vs Rohit Sharma — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Renuka Singh or Rohit Sharma?
What is the price difference between Renuka Singh and Rohit Sharma?
How many MOTM awards have Renuka Singh and Rohit Sharma won?
Should I pick Renuka Singh or Rohit Sharma in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Renuka Singh or Rohit Sharma?
Who has more ODI runs, Renuka Singh or Rohit Sharma?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Renuka Singh or Rohit Sharma?
Who has more Test runs, Renuka Singh or Rohit Sharma?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Renuka Singh or Rohit Sharma — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.