⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Renuka Singh vs Virat Kohli — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Virat Kohli has the edge on the headline numbers: Virat Kohli leads on T20I batting (4,188 runs, avg 48.7). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Renuka Singh (India Women) has 13 T20I runs at avg 4.3 in 65 matches. Virat Kohli (India) has 4,188 T20I runs at avg 48.7 in 125 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Renuka Singh vs Virat Kohli — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Renuka Singh | Virat Kohli |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 2 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 39 | 81 |
| Best fantasy score | 49 | 211 |
| Runs | 0 | 890 |
| Strike rate | 0.0 | 150.6 |
| Fours | 0 | 92 |
| Sixes | 0 | 32 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 2 |
| Highest score | 0 | 139 |
| Wickets | 2 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 8.86 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 1 | 0 |
| Catches | 1 | 10 |
| Total dismissals | 1 | 11 |
| Statistic | Renuka Singh | Virat Kohli |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 65 | 125 |
| Runs | 13 | 4188 |
| Batting average | 4.33 | 48.70 |
| Strike rate | 86.7 | 137.0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 38 |
| Wickets | 71 | 4 |
| Bowling average | 22.41 | 51.00 |
| Economy rate | 6.68 | 8.05 |
| Five-wicket hauls | 1 | 0 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Renuka Singh has played 65 T20Is and Virat Kohli 125. Renuka Singh has 13 runs at 4.3 (strike rate 86.7), against 4,188 at 48.7 (137.0) for Virat Kohli, so Virat Kohli has scored more. Hundreds: Renuka Singh 0, Virat Kohli 1. Fifties: 0 and 38. With the ball, Renuka Singh has 71 wickets at an economy of 6.68 and Virat Kohli 4 at 8.05; Renuka Singh has more wickets.
ODI. Renuka Singh has played 29 ODIs and Virat Kohli 315. Renuka Singh has 21 runs at 2.3 (strike rate 37.5), against 15,080 at 59.1 (95.5) for Virat Kohli, so Virat Kohli has scored more. Hundreds: Renuka Singh 0, Virat Kohli 55. Fifties: 0 and 79. With the ball, Renuka Singh has 42 wickets at an economy of 4.92 and Virat Kohli 5 at 6.16; Renuka Singh has more wickets.
Test. Renuka Singh has played 3 Tests and Virat Kohli 123. Renuka Singh has 9 runs at 4.5 (strike rate 56.3), against 9,230 at 46.9 (55.6) for Virat Kohli, so Virat Kohli has scored more. Hundreds: Renuka Singh 0, Virat Kohli 30. Fifties: 0 and 31.
International numbers up to 19 July 2026.
Renuka Singh vs Virat Kohli — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Renuka Singh has scored 13 T20I runs in 65 matches at an average of 4.33. She has also taken 71 T20I wickets at an average of 22.41 with an economy of 6.68.
T20I career: Virat Kohli has scored 4,188 T20I runs in 125 matches at an average of 48.70, with 1 century. He has also taken 4 T20I wickets at an average of 51.00 with an economy of 8.05.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Virat Kohli is the stronger pick with an average of 81 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Renuka Singh or Virat Kohli?
Renuka Singh vs Virat Kohli — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Renuka Singh or Virat Kohli?
What is the price difference between Renuka Singh and Virat Kohli?
How many MOTM awards have Renuka Singh and Virat Kohli won?
Should I pick Renuka Singh or Virat Kohli in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Renuka Singh or Virat Kohli?
Who has more ODI runs, Renuka Singh or Virat Kohli?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Renuka Singh or Virat Kohli?
Who has more Test runs, Renuka Singh or Virat Kohli?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Renuka Singh or Virat Kohli — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.