⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Rishabh Pant vs Shaheen Shah Afridi — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rishabh Pant has the edge on the headline numbers: Rishabh Pant leads on T20I batting (1,209 runs, avg 23.3). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Rishabh Pant (Lucknow Super Giants) has 1,209 T20I runs at avg 23.3 in 76 matches. Shaheen Shah Afridi (Pakistan) has 345 T20I runs at avg 14.4 in 103 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Rishabh Pant vs Shaheen Shah Afridi — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Rishabh Pant | Shaheen Shah Afridi |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 17 | 6 |
| Avg fantasy points | 62 | 74 |
| Best fantasy score | 197 | 127 |
| Runs | 561 | 16 |
| Strike rate | 98.9 | 64.0 |
| Fours | 54 | 2 |
| Sixes | 19 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 105 | 11 |
| Wickets | 0 | 11 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 5.82 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 3 |
| Catches | 15 | 2 |
| Total dismissals | 20 | 2 |
| Statistic | Rishabh Pant | Shaheen Shah Afridi |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 76 | 103 |
| Runs | 1209 | 345 |
| Batting average | 23.25 | 14.38 |
| Strike rate | — | 128.3 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 0 |
| Wickets | 0 | 136 |
| Bowling average | — | 21.35 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Rishabh Pant has played 76 T20Is and Shaheen Shah Afridi 103. Rishabh Pant has 1,209 runs at 23.3, against 345 at 14.4 (128.3) for Shaheen Shah Afridi, so Rishabh Pant has scored more. Shaheen Shah Afridi also bowls: 136 wickets, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Rishabh Pant has played 31 ODIs and Shaheen Shah Afridi 77. Rishabh Pant has 871 runs at 33.5 (strike rate 106.2), against 332 at 13.3 (88.5) for Shaheen Shah Afridi, so Rishabh Pant has scored more. Hundreds: Rishabh Pant 1, Shaheen Shah Afridi 0. Fifties: 5 and 0. Shaheen Shah Afridi also bowls: 146 wickets, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Rishabh Pant has played 51 Tests and Shaheen Shah Afridi 34. Rishabh Pant has 3,644 runs at 43.4 (strike rate 74.3), against 269 at 7.3 (42.8) for Shaheen Shah Afridi, so Rishabh Pant has scored more. Hundreds: Rishabh Pant 8, Shaheen Shah Afridi 0. Fifties: 20 and 0. Shaheen Shah Afridi also bowls: 126 wickets at an economy of 3.18, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 23 August 2026.
Rishabh Pant vs Shaheen Shah Afridi — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Rishabh Pant has scored 1,209 T20I runs in 76 matches at an average of 23.25, with 3 half-centuries.
T20I career: Shaheen Shah Afridi has scored 345 T20I runs in 103 matches at an average of 14.38. He has also taken 136 T20I wickets at an average of 21.35.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shaheen Shah Afridi is the stronger pick with an average of 74 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Rishabh Pant or Shaheen Shah Afridi?
Rishabh Pant vs Shaheen Shah Afridi — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Rishabh Pant or Shaheen Shah Afridi?
What is the price difference between Rishabh Pant and Shaheen Shah Afridi?
How many MOTM awards have Rishabh Pant and Shaheen Shah Afridi won?
Should I pick Rishabh Pant or Shaheen Shah Afridi in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Rishabh Pant or Shaheen Shah Afridi?
Who has more ODI runs, Rishabh Pant or Shaheen Shah Afridi?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has more Test runs, Rishabh Pant or Shaheen Shah Afridi?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Rishabh Pant or Shaheen Shah Afridi — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.