⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Rishabh Pant vs Sophie Ecclestone — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rishabh Pant has the edge on the headline numbers: Rishabh Pant leads on T20I batting (1,209 runs, avg 23.3). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Rishabh Pant (Lucknow Super Giants) has 1,209 T20I runs at avg 23.3 in 76 matches. Sophie Ecclestone (England Women) has 368 T20I runs at avg 17.5 in 113 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Rishabh Pant vs Sophie Ecclestone — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Rishabh Pant | Sophie Ecclestone |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 17 | 18 |
| Avg fantasy points | 62 | 68 |
| Best fantasy score | 197 | 337 |
| Runs | 561 | 97 |
| Strike rate | 98.9 | 82.2 |
| Fours | 54 | 12 |
| Sixes | 19 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 1 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 105 | 61 |
| Wickets | 0 | 27 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 4.90 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 8 |
| Catches | 15 | 5 |
| Total dismissals | 20 | 8 |
| Statistic | Rishabh Pant | Sophie Ecclestone |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 76 | 113 |
| Runs | 1209 | 368 |
| Batting average | 23.25 | 17.52 |
| Strike rate | — | 132.8 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 0 |
| Wickets | 0 | 154 |
| Bowling average | — | 16.51 |
| Economy rate | — | 6.05 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Rishabh Pant has played 76 T20Is and Sophie Ecclestone 113. Rishabh Pant has 1,209 runs at 23.3, against 368 at 17.5 (132.8) for Sophie Ecclestone, so Rishabh Pant has scored more. Sophie Ecclestone also bowls: 154 wickets at an economy of 6.05, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Rishabh Pant has played 31 ODIs and Sophie Ecclestone 84. Rishabh Pant has 871 runs at 33.5 (strike rate 106.2), against 426 at 10.7 (73.6) for Sophie Ecclestone, so Rishabh Pant has scored more. Hundreds: Rishabh Pant 1, Sophie Ecclestone 0. Fifties: 5 and 0. Sophie Ecclestone also bowls: 141 wickets, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Rishabh Pant has played 51 Tests and Sophie Ecclestone 10. Rishabh Pant has 3,644 runs at 43.4 (strike rate 74.3), against 257 at 19.8 (46.6) for Sophie Ecclestone, so Rishabh Pant has scored more. Hundreds: Rishabh Pant 8, Sophie Ecclestone 0. Fifties: 20 and 1. Sophie Ecclestone also bowls: 48 wickets at an economy of 2.91, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 23 August 2026.
Rishabh Pant vs Sophie Ecclestone — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Rishabh Pant has scored 1,209 T20I runs in 76 matches at an average of 23.25, with 3 half-centuries.
T20I career: Sophie Ecclestone has scored 368 T20I runs in 113 matches at an average of 17.52. She has also taken 154 T20I wickets at an average of 16.51 with an economy of 6.05.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Sophie Ecclestone is the stronger pick with an average of 68 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Rishabh Pant or Sophie Ecclestone?
Rishabh Pant vs Sophie Ecclestone — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Rishabh Pant or Sophie Ecclestone?
What is the price difference between Rishabh Pant and Sophie Ecclestone?
How many MOTM awards have Rishabh Pant and Sophie Ecclestone won?
Should I pick Rishabh Pant or Sophie Ecclestone in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Rishabh Pant or Sophie Ecclestone?
Who has more ODI runs, Rishabh Pant or Sophie Ecclestone?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has more Test runs, Rishabh Pant or Sophie Ecclestone?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Rishabh Pant or Sophie Ecclestone — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.