⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Rishabh Pant vs Tahlia McGrath — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Tahlia McGrath has the edge on the headline numbers: Tahlia McGrath leads on T20I batting (1,155 runs, avg 41.3). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Rishabh Pant (Lucknow Super Giants) has 1,209 T20I runs at avg 23.3 in 76 matches. Tahlia McGrath (Australia Women) has 1,155 T20I runs at avg 41.3 in 59 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Rishabh Pant vs Tahlia McGrath — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Rishabh Pant | Tahlia McGrath |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 17 | 5 |
| Avg fantasy points | 62 | 31 |
| Best fantasy score | 197 | 96 |
| Runs | 561 | 40 |
| Strike rate | 98.9 | 72.7 |
| Fours | 54 | 2 |
| Sixes | 19 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 105 | 24 |
| Wickets | 0 | 3 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 4.60 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 2 |
| Catches | 15 | 0 |
| Total dismissals | 20 | 0 |
| Statistic | Rishabh Pant | Tahlia McGrath |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 76 | 59 |
| Runs | 1209 | 1155 |
| Batting average | 23.25 | 41.25 |
| Strike rate | — | 132.0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 7 |
| Wickets | 0 | 21 |
| Bowling average | — | 24.57 |
| Economy rate | — | 8.13 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Rishabh Pant has played 76 T20Is and Tahlia McGrath 59. Rishabh Pant has 1,209 runs at 23.3, against 1,155 at 41.3 (132.0) for Tahlia McGrath, so Rishabh Pant has scored more. Tahlia McGrath also bowls: 21 wickets at an economy of 8.13, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Rishabh Pant has played 31 ODIs and Tahlia McGrath 59. Rishabh Pant has 871 runs at 33.5 (strike rate 106.2), against 861 at 26.1 (87.9) for Tahlia McGrath, so Rishabh Pant has scored more. Hundreds: Rishabh Pant 1, Tahlia McGrath 0. Fifties: 5 and 5. Tahlia McGrath also bowls: 32 wickets at an economy of 5.19, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Rishabh Pant has played 51 Tests and Tahlia McGrath 8. Rishabh Pant has 3,644 runs at 43.4 (strike rate 74.3), against 371 at 33.7 (49.7) for Tahlia McGrath, so Rishabh Pant has scored more. Hundreds: Rishabh Pant 8, Tahlia McGrath 0. Fifties: 20 and 4. Tahlia McGrath also bowls: 11 wickets at an economy of 2.53, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 23 August 2026.
Rishabh Pant vs Tahlia McGrath — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Rishabh Pant has scored 1,209 T20I runs in 76 matches at an average of 23.25, with 3 half-centuries.
T20I career: Tahlia McGrath has scored 1,155 T20I runs in 59 matches at an average of 41.25, with 7 half-centuries. She has also taken 21 T20I wickets at an average of 24.57 with an economy of 8.13.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rishabh Pant is the stronger pick with an average of 62 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Rishabh Pant or Tahlia McGrath?
Rishabh Pant vs Tahlia McGrath — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Rishabh Pant or Tahlia McGrath?
What is the price difference between Rishabh Pant and Tahlia McGrath?
How many MOTM awards have Rishabh Pant and Tahlia McGrath won?
Should I pick Rishabh Pant or Tahlia McGrath in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Rishabh Pant or Tahlia McGrath?
Who has more ODI runs, Rishabh Pant or Tahlia McGrath?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has more Test runs, Rishabh Pant or Tahlia McGrath?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Rishabh Pant or Tahlia McGrath — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.