⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Rishabh Pant vs Wellington Masakadza — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rishabh Pant has the edge on the headline numbers: Rishabh Pant leads on T20I batting (1,209 runs, avg 23.3). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Rishabh Pant (Lucknow Super Giants) has 1,209 T20I runs at avg 23.3 in 76 matches. Wellington Masakadza (Zimbabwe) has 259 T20I runs at avg 8.6 in 75 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Rishabh Pant vs Wellington Masakadza — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Rishabh Pant | Wellington Masakadza |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 17 | 7 |
| Avg fantasy points | 62 | 22 |
| Best fantasy score | 197 | 75 |
| Runs | 561 | 42 |
| Strike rate | 98.9 | 102.4 |
| Fours | 54 | 5 |
| Sixes | 19 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 105 | 14 |
| Wickets | 0 | 3 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 7.52 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 2 |
| Catches | 15 | 2 |
| Total dismissals | 20 | 2 |
| Statistic | Rishabh Pant | Wellington Masakadza |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 76 | 75 |
| Runs | 1209 | 259 |
| Batting average | 23.25 | 8.63 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 0 |
| Wickets | 0 | 48 |
| Bowling average | — | 31.60 |
| Economy rate | — | 7.45 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Rishabh Pant has played 76 T20Is and Wellington Masakadza 75. Rishabh Pant has 1,209 runs at 23.3, against 259 at 8.6 for Wellington Masakadza, so Rishabh Pant has scored more. Wellington Masakadza also bowls: 48 wickets at an economy of 7.45, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Rishabh Pant has played 31 ODIs and Wellington Masakadza 42. Rishabh Pant has 871 runs at 33.5 (strike rate 106.2), against 243 at 11.1 (64.8) for Wellington Masakadza, so Rishabh Pant has scored more. Hundreds: Rishabh Pant 1, Wellington Masakadza 0. Fifties: 5 and 0. Wellington Masakadza also bowls: 33 wickets, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Rishabh Pant has played 51 Tests and Wellington Masakadza 7. Rishabh Pant has 3,644 runs at 43.4 (strike rate 74.3), against 159 at 13.3 (30.4) for Wellington Masakadza, so Rishabh Pant has scored more. Hundreds: Rishabh Pant 8, Wellington Masakadza 0. Fifties: 20 and 1. Wellington Masakadza also bowls: 19 wickets at an economy of 3.43, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 1 September 2026.
Rishabh Pant vs Wellington Masakadza — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Rishabh Pant has scored 1,209 T20I runs in 76 matches at an average of 23.25, with 3 half-centuries.
T20I career: Wellington Masakadza has scored 259 T20I runs in 75 matches at an average of 8.63. He has also taken 48 T20I wickets at an average of 31.60 with an economy of 7.45.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rishabh Pant is the stronger pick with an average of 62 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Rishabh Pant or Wellington Masakadza?
Rishabh Pant vs Wellington Masakadza — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Rishabh Pant or Wellington Masakadza?
What is the price difference between Rishabh Pant and Wellington Masakadza?
How many MOTM awards have Rishabh Pant and Wellington Masakadza won?
Should I pick Rishabh Pant or Wellington Masakadza in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Rishabh Pant or Wellington Masakadza?
Who has more ODI runs, Rishabh Pant or Wellington Masakadza?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has more Test runs, Rishabh Pant or Wellington Masakadza?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Rishabh Pant or Wellington Masakadza — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.