⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Rishabh Pant vs Wessly Madhevere — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rishabh Pant has the edge on the headline numbers: Rishabh Pant leads on T20I batting (1,209 runs, avg 23.3). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Rishabh Pant (Lucknow Super Giants) has 1,209 T20I runs at avg 23.3 in 76 matches. Wessly Madhevere (Zimbabwe) has 1,247 T20I runs at avg 19.5 in 77 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Rishabh Pant vs Wessly Madhevere — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Rishabh Pant | Wessly Madhevere |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 17 | 15 |
| Avg fantasy points | 62 | 48 |
| Best fantasy score | 197 | 122 |
| Runs | 561 | 305 |
| Strike rate | 98.9 | 85.4 |
| Fours | 54 | 27 |
| Sixes | 19 | 4 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 2 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 105 | 77 |
| Wickets | 0 | 7 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 6.68 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 3 |
| Catches | 15 | 8 |
| Total dismissals | 20 | 9 |
| Statistic | Rishabh Pant | Wessly Madhevere |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 76 | 77 |
| Runs | 1209 | 1247 |
| Batting average | 23.25 | 19.48 |
| Strike rate | — | 114.4 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 7 |
| Wickets | 0 | 19 |
| Bowling average | — | 28.68 |
| Economy rate | — | 7.08 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Rishabh Pant has played 76 T20Is and Wessly Madhevere 77. Rishabh Pant has 1,209 runs at 23.3, against 1,247 at 19.5 (114.4) for Wessly Madhevere, so Wessly Madhevere has scored more. Wessly Madhevere also bowls: 19 wickets at an economy of 7.08, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Rishabh Pant has played 31 ODIs and Wessly Madhevere 40. Rishabh Pant has 871 runs at 33.5 (strike rate 106.2), against 841 at 22.7 (79.0) for Wessly Madhevere, so Rishabh Pant has scored more. Hundreds: Rishabh Pant 1, Wessly Madhevere 0. Fifties: 5 and 7. Wessly Madhevere also bowls: 16 wickets at an economy of 5.20, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Rishabh Pant has played 51 Tests and Wessly Madhevere 7. Rishabh Pant has 3,644 runs at 43.4 (strike rate 74.3), against 321 at 29.2 (53.7) for Wessly Madhevere, so Rishabh Pant has scored more. Hundreds: Rishabh Pant 8, Wessly Madhevere 0. Fifties: 20 and 2. Wessly Madhevere also bowls: 7 wickets at an economy of 3.68, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 1 September 2026.
Rishabh Pant vs Wessly Madhevere — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Rishabh Pant has scored 1,209 T20I runs in 76 matches at an average of 23.25, with 3 half-centuries.
T20I career: Wessly Madhevere has scored 1,247 T20I runs in 77 matches at an average of 19.48, with 7 half-centuries. He has also taken 19 T20I wickets at an average of 28.68 with an economy of 7.08.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rishabh Pant is the stronger pick with an average of 62 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Rishabh Pant or Wessly Madhevere?
Rishabh Pant vs Wessly Madhevere — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Rishabh Pant or Wessly Madhevere?
What is the price difference between Rishabh Pant and Wessly Madhevere?
How many MOTM awards have Rishabh Pant and Wessly Madhevere won?
Should I pick Rishabh Pant or Wessly Madhevere in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Rishabh Pant or Wessly Madhevere?
Who has more ODI runs, Rishabh Pant or Wessly Madhevere?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has more Test runs, Rishabh Pant or Wessly Madhevere?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Rishabh Pant or Wessly Madhevere — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.