⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Rohit Sharma vs Shikha Pandey: Who Is Better? International Stats Comparison
Rohit Sharma has the edge on the headline numbers: Rohit Sharma leads on T20I batting (4,231 runs, avg 32.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Rohit Sharma (India) has 4,231 T20I runs at avg 32.0 in 159 matches. Shikha Pandey () has 208 T20I runs at avg 13.0 in 62 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Rohit Sharma vs Shikha Pandey — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Rohit Sharma | Shikha Pandey |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 19 | 0 |
| Avg fantasy points | 79 | 0 |
| Best fantasy score | 214 | 0 |
| Runs | 885 | 0 |
| Strike rate | 126.2 | 0.0 |
| Fours | 85 | 0 |
| Sixes | 49 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 5 | 0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 2 | 0 |
| Highest score | 138 | 0 |
| Catches | 9 | 0 |
| Total dismissals | 9 | 0 |
| Statistic | Rohit Sharma | Shikha Pandey |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 159 | 62 |
| Runs | 4231 | 208 |
| Batting average | 32.05 | 13.00 |
| Strike rate | 140.9 | 79.1 |
| Centuries (100+) | 5 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 32 | 0 |
| Wickets | 1 | 43 |
| Bowling average | 113.00 | 26.16 |
| Economy rate | 9.97 | 6.49 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Rohit Sharma has played 159 T20Is and Shikha Pandey 62. Rohit Sharma has 4,231 runs at 32.0 (strike rate 140.9), against 208 at 13.0 (79.1) for Shikha Pandey, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Rohit Sharma 5, Shikha Pandey 0. Fifties: 32 and 0. With the ball, Rohit Sharma has 1 wickets at an economy of 9.97 and Shikha Pandey 43 at 6.49; Shikha Pandey has more wickets.
ODI. Rohit Sharma has played 291 ODIs and Shikha Pandey 55. Rohit Sharma has 12,120 runs at 49.3, against 512 at 20.5 (90.1) for Shikha Pandey, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Rohit Sharma 35, Shikha Pandey 0. Fifties: 63 and 2. With the ball, Rohit Sharma has 9 wickets at an economy of 5.24 and Shikha Pandey 75 at 3.99; Shikha Pandey has more wickets.
Test. Rohit Sharma has played 67 Tests and Shikha Pandey 3. Rohit Sharma has 4,301 runs at 40.6 (strike rate 57.1), against 55 at 18.3 (26.7) for Shikha Pandey, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Rohit Sharma 12, Shikha Pandey 0. Fifties: 18 and 0.
International numbers up to 19 July 2026.
Rohit Sharma vs Shikha Pandey — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Rohit Sharma has scored 4,231 T20I runs in 159 matches at an average of 32.05, with 5 centuries. He has also taken 1 T20I wickets at an average of 113.00 with an economy of 9.97.
T20I career: Shikha Pandey has scored 208 T20I runs in 62 matches at an average of 13.00. He has also taken 43 T20I wickets at an average of 26.16 with an economy of 6.49.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rohit Sharma is the stronger pick with an average of 79 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Rohit Sharma or Shikha Pandey?
Rohit Sharma vs Shikha Pandey — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Rohit Sharma or Shikha Pandey?
What is the price difference between Rohit Sharma and Shikha Pandey?
How many MOTM awards have Rohit Sharma and Shikha Pandey won?
Should I pick Rohit Sharma or Shikha Pandey in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Rohit Sharma or Shikha Pandey?
Who has the better T20I strike rate?
Who has more ODI runs, Rohit Sharma or Shikha Pandey?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Rohit Sharma or Shikha Pandey?
Who has more Test runs, Rohit Sharma or Shikha Pandey?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Rohit Sharma or Shikha Pandey — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.