⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD

Rohit Sharma vs Sikandar Raza — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison

Who is better — Rohit Sharma or Sikandar Raza?

Rohit Sharma has the edge on the headline numbers: Rohit Sharma leads on T20I batting (4,231 runs, avg 32.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.

Rohit Sharma (India) has 4,231 T20I runs at avg 32.0 in 159 matches. Sikandar Raza (Zimbabwe) has 2,740 T20I runs at avg 25.6 in 123 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.

Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form

TweetWhatsApp
PLAYER 1
🏏
Rohit Sharma
🇮🇳 IND · 9.5 cr
VS
PLAYER 2
🏏
Sikandar Raza
🇿🇼 ZIM · 8.5 cr
🏏
Rohit Sharma
🇮🇳 India
BAT
9.5 cr
Credits
79
Avg Pts
214
Best FP
119.5
Pts/Cr
885
Total Runs
0
Total Wkts
🏏
Sikandar Raza
🇿🇼 Zimbabwe
AR🏅 1× MOTM
8.5 cr
Credits
59
Avg Pts
169
Best FP
65.2
Pts/Cr
448
Total Runs
12
Total Wkts
🔥 Clear Pick
🏏 Rohit Sharma
20 higher avg pts · 214 best fantasy score
🏏 Rohit Sharma
VS
🏏 Sikandar Raza
T20I Career Overview
159Matches123
🏏 Batting
4231Runs2740
32.05Batting Avg25.61
140.89Strike Rate136.32
5Centuries1
32Half-Centuries15
205Sixes 🔴136
121*
Best Score
133*
🎳 Bowling
1Wickets103
113.00Bowling Avg24.06
9.97Economy Rate7.08
05-Wkt Hauls1
1/22
Best Figures
5/18
Source: Cricsheet (cricsheet.org, CC BY 4.0) · International matches only

Rohit Sharma vs Sikandar Raza — Stat Comparison Table

Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).

IPL season stats
StatisticRohit SharmaSikandar Raza
Matches1920
Avg fantasy points7959
Best fantasy score214169
Runs885448
Strike rate126.297.0
Fours8537
Sixes4912
Half-centuries (50+)52
Centuries (100+)20
Highest score13881
Wickets012
Economy rate0.006.78
Best spell (wkts)02
Catches910
Total dismissals912
International career — T20I
StatisticRohit SharmaSikandar Raza
Matches159123
Runs42312740
Batting average32.0525.61
Strike rate140.9136.3
Centuries (100+)51
Half-centuries (50+)3215
Wickets1103
Bowling average113.0024.06
Economy rate9.977.08
Five-wicket hauls01

📋 Format by format

T20I. Rohit Sharma has played 159 T20Is and Sikandar Raza 123. Rohit Sharma has 4,231 runs at 32.0 (strike rate 140.9), against 2,740 at 25.6 (136.3) for Sikandar Raza, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Rohit Sharma 5, Sikandar Raza 1. Fifties: 32 and 15. With the ball, Rohit Sharma has 1 wickets at an economy of 9.97 and Sikandar Raza 103 at 7.08; Sikandar Raza has more wickets.

ODI. Rohit Sharma has played 291 ODIs and Sikandar Raza 128. Rohit Sharma has 12,120 runs at 49.3, against 3,707 at 36.7 (87.8) for Sikandar Raza, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Rohit Sharma 35, Sikandar Raza 6. Fifties: 63 and 20. With the ball, Rohit Sharma has 9 wickets at an economy of 5.24 and Sikandar Raza 76 at 4.96; Sikandar Raza has more wickets.

Test. Rohit Sharma has played 67 Tests and Sikandar Raza 18. Rohit Sharma has 4,301 runs at 40.6 (strike rate 57.1), against 1,120 at 31.1 (54.6) for Sikandar Raza, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Rohit Sharma 12, Sikandar Raza 1. Fifties: 18 and 8. With the ball, Rohit Sharma has 2 wickets at an economy of 3.51 and Sikandar Raza 34 at 3.30; Sikandar Raza has more wickets.

International numbers up to 1 September 2026.

Stats updated
⚡ Strengths & Captaincy Pick
🏏 Rohit Sharma
✓ Superior run-scorer
✓ Higher strike rate
✓ More big-hitting sixes
✓ Higher avg fantasy pts
🏏 Sikandar Raza
✓ More wickets
✓ More MOTM awards
👑 Captaincy Recommendation
C: 🏏 Rohit Sharma
79 avg pts · 214 best · 0 MOTM
VC: 🏏 Sikandar Raza
Captaining Rohit Sharma gives you 2× pts. Always verify playing XI before locking.
📝 T20I Career Comparison

Rohit Sharma vs Sikandar Raza — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.

T20I career: Rohit Sharma has scored 4,231 T20I runs in 159 matches at an average of 32.05, with 5 centuries. He has also taken 1 T20I wickets at an average of 113.00 with an economy of 9.97.

T20I career: Sikandar Raza has scored 2,740 T20I runs in 123 matches at an average of 25.61, with 1 century. He has also taken 103 T20I wickets at an average of 24.06 with an economy of 7.08.

Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rohit Sharma is the stronger pick with an average of 79 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.

Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Who has better fantasy stats — Rohit Sharma or Sikandar Raza?

Based on recent data, Rohit Sharma has the edge with a higher average of 79 fantasy points per game. Rohit Sharma leads in runs scored (885 runs). Overall Rohit Sharma is the stronger fantasy pick this season.

Rohit Sharma vs Sikandar Raza — who is a better fantasy captain?

Rohit Sharma is the recommended fantasy captain pick, averaging 79 pts per game with a best score of 214 pts. As captain you earn 2× points, so choosing the player in better form is crucial. Always check the toss and playing XI before finalising your captain.

Who has a better strike rate — Rohit Sharma or Sikandar Raza?

Rohit Sharma has the superior batting strike rate this season (126.2), making them more valuable in T20 cricket where quick scoring is rewarded with bonus fantasy points.

What is the price difference between Rohit Sharma and Sikandar Raza?

Rohit Sharma costs 9.5 Cr and Sikandar Raza costs 8.5 Cr in current fantasy. The player with lower credits who delivers similar points gives you better value, freeing up budget for other expensive picks.

How many MOTM awards have Rohit Sharma and Sikandar Raza won?

Rohit Sharma has won 0 Man of the Match awards and Sikandar Raza has won 1 MOTM award. MOTM winners earn +25 bonus fantasy points, making them extremely valuable.

Should I pick Rohit Sharma or Sikandar Raza in my fantasy XI?

If you can only pick one, Rohit Sharma is the statistically stronger fantasy cricket pick this season. However, consider the match conditions — if India are favourites, more of their players will contribute, and vice versa for Zimbabwe. Use this comparison tool to make an informed decision every match.

Who has more T20I runs, Rohit Sharma or Sikandar Raza?

Rohit Sharma has more T20I runs: Rohit Sharma has 4,231 in 159 matches (average 32.0) and Sikandar Raza has 2,740 in 123 (average 25.6).

Who has the better T20I strike rate?

Rohit Sharma scores faster in T20Is: Rohit Sharma strikes at 140.9 and Sikandar Raza at 136.3.

Who has more ODI runs, Rohit Sharma or Sikandar Raza?

Rohit Sharma has more ODI runs: Rohit Sharma has 12,120 in 291 matches (average 49.3) and Sikandar Raza has 3,707 in 128 (average 36.7).

Who has taken more ODI wickets, Rohit Sharma or Sikandar Raza?

Sikandar Raza has more ODI wickets: Rohit Sharma has 9 at an average of 59.2 and Sikandar Raza has 76 at 46.3.

Who has more Test runs, Rohit Sharma or Sikandar Raza?

Rohit Sharma has more Test runs: Rohit Sharma has 4,301 in 67 matches (average 40.6) and Sikandar Raza has 1,120 in 18 (average 31.1).
READY TO PLAY?
Pick Sharma & Raza in your fantasy XI
Free to play · No prize pool · Just bragging rights
Build XI →

SETTLE IT IN A GAME

Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Rohit Sharma or Sikandar Raza — and see who actually delivers.

Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.

CricketDreamCRICKETDREAM FANTASY
© 2026 CricketDream · Fantasy Cricket Platform · Built for cricket fans
Disclaimer: This platform is intended for users aged 18 years and above only. CricketDream is a free, skill-based fantasy cricket platform for entertainment purposes only. No monetary transactions or prizes are involved. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, licensed by, or sponsored by the BCCI, the IPL, any IPL franchise, or any other cricket governing body. All team names, player names, and logos are property of their respective owners.
⚽ ALSO INTO FOOTBALL?
Play Fantasy Football, Draft & Predictor — on FootballDream.in
🎯 Predictor📋 Team Draft👤 Player Draft
Play Now → footballdream.in