⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Rohit Sharma vs Tom Curran — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rohit Sharma has the edge on the headline numbers: Rohit Sharma leads on T20I batting (4,231 runs, avg 32.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Rohit Sharma (India) has 4,231 T20I runs at avg 32.0 in 159 matches. Tom Curran (Edinburgh Castle Rockers) has 64 T20I runs at avg 10.7 in 30 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Rohit Sharma vs Tom Curran — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Rohit Sharma | Tom Curran |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 19 | 17 |
| Avg fantasy points | 79 | 62 |
| Best fantasy score | 214 | 170 |
| Runs | 885 | 129 |
| Strike rate | 126.2 | 172.0 |
| Fours | 85 | 6 |
| Sixes | 49 | 8 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 5 | 0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 2 | 0 |
| Highest score | 138 | 33 |
| Wickets | 0 | 24 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 8.65 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 4 |
| Catches | 9 | 2 |
| Total dismissals | 9 | 3 |
| Statistic | Rohit Sharma | Tom Curran |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 159 | 30 |
| Runs | 4231 | 64 |
| Batting average | 32.05 | 10.67 |
| Strike rate | 140.9 | 114.3 |
| Centuries (100+) | 5 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 32 | 0 |
| Wickets | 1 | 29 |
| Bowling average | 113.00 | 31.28 |
| Economy rate | 9.97 | 9.26 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Rohit Sharma has played 159 T20Is and Tom Curran 30. Rohit Sharma has 4,231 runs at 32.0 (strike rate 140.9), against 64 at 10.7 (114.3) for Tom Curran, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Rohit Sharma 5, Tom Curran 0. Fifties: 32 and 0. With the ball, Rohit Sharma has 1 wickets at an economy of 9.97 and Tom Curran 29 at 9.26; Tom Curran has more wickets.
ODI. Rohit Sharma has played 291 ODIs and Tom Curran 28. Rohit Sharma has 12,120 runs at 49.3, against 303 at 37.9 (94.4) for Tom Curran, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Rohit Sharma 35, Tom Curran 0. Fifties: 63 and 0. With the ball, Rohit Sharma has 9 wickets at an economy of 5.24 and Tom Curran 34 at 5.92; Tom Curran has more wickets while Rohit Sharma is more economical.
Test. Rohit Sharma has played 67 Tests and Tom Curran 2. Rohit Sharma has 4,301 runs at 40.6 (strike rate 57.1), against 66 at 33.0 (55.0) for Tom Curran, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Rohit Sharma 12, Tom Curran 0. Fifties: 18 and 0.
International numbers up to 19 July 2026.
Rohit Sharma vs Tom Curran — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Rohit Sharma has scored 4,231 T20I runs in 159 matches at an average of 32.05, with 5 centuries. He has also taken 1 T20I wickets at an average of 113.00 with an economy of 9.97.
T20I career: Tom Curran has scored 64 T20I runs in 30 matches at an average of 10.67. He has also taken 29 T20I wickets at an average of 31.28 with an economy of 9.26.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rohit Sharma is the stronger pick with an average of 79 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Rohit Sharma or Tom Curran?
Rohit Sharma vs Tom Curran — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Rohit Sharma or Tom Curran?
What is the price difference between Rohit Sharma and Tom Curran?
How many MOTM awards have Rohit Sharma and Tom Curran won?
Should I pick Rohit Sharma or Tom Curran in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Rohit Sharma or Tom Curran?
Who has more ODI runs, Rohit Sharma or Tom Curran?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Rohit Sharma or Tom Curran?
Who has more Test runs, Rohit Sharma or Tom Curran?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Rohit Sharma or Tom Curran — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.