⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Rohit Sharma vs Yuvraj Singh — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rohit Sharma has the edge on the headline numbers: Rohit Sharma leads on T20I batting (4,231 runs, avg 32.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Rohit Sharma (India) has 4,231 T20I runs at avg 32.0 in 159 matches. Yuvraj Singh (Punjab Kings) has 1,177 T20I runs at avg 28.0 in 58 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Rohit Sharma vs Yuvraj Singh — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Rohit Sharma | Yuvraj Singh |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 19 | 0 |
| Avg fantasy points | 79 | 0 |
| Best fantasy score | 214 | 0 |
| Runs | 885 | 0 |
| Strike rate | 126.2 | 0.0 |
| Fours | 85 | 0 |
| Sixes | 49 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 5 | 0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 2 | 0 |
| Highest score | 138 | 0 |
| Catches | 9 | 0 |
| Total dismissals | 9 | 0 |
| Statistic | Rohit Sharma | Yuvraj Singh |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 159 | 58 |
| Runs | 4231 | 1177 |
| Batting average | 32.05 | 28.02 |
| Strike rate | 140.9 | — |
| Centuries (100+) | 5 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 32 | 8 |
| Wickets | 1 | 29 |
| Bowling average | 113.00 | 17.83 |
| Economy rate | 9.97 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Rohit Sharma has played 159 T20Is and Yuvraj Singh 58. Rohit Sharma has 4,231 runs at 32.0 (strike rate 140.9), against 1,177 at 28.0 for Yuvraj Singh, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Rohit Sharma 5, Yuvraj Singh 0. Fifties: 32 and 8. With the ball, Rohit Sharma has 1 wickets at an economy of 9.97 and Yuvraj Singh 29; Yuvraj Singh has more wickets.
ODI. Rohit Sharma has played 291 ODIs and Yuvraj Singh 304. Rohit Sharma has 12,120 runs at 49.3, against 8,701 at 36.6 for Yuvraj Singh, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Rohit Sharma 35, Yuvraj Singh 14. Fifties: 63 and 52. With the ball, Rohit Sharma has 9 wickets at an economy of 5.24 and Yuvraj Singh 111; Yuvraj Singh has more wickets.
Test. Rohit Sharma has played 67 Tests and Yuvraj Singh 40. Rohit Sharma has 4,301 runs at 40.6 (strike rate 57.1), against 1,900 at 33.9 for Yuvraj Singh, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Rohit Sharma 12, Yuvraj Singh 3. Fifties: 18 and 11. With the ball, Rohit Sharma has 2 wickets at an economy of 3.51 and Yuvraj Singh 10; Yuvraj Singh has more wickets.
International numbers up to 19 July 2026.
Rohit Sharma vs Yuvraj Singh — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Rohit Sharma has scored 4,231 T20I runs in 159 matches at an average of 32.05, with 5 centuries. He has also taken 1 T20I wickets at an average of 113.00 with an economy of 9.97.
T20I career: Yuvraj Singh has scored 1,177 T20I runs in 58 matches at an average of 28.02, with 8 half-centuries. He has also taken 29 T20I wickets at an average of 17.83.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rohit Sharma is the stronger pick with an average of 79 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Rohit Sharma or Yuvraj Singh?
Rohit Sharma vs Yuvraj Singh — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Rohit Sharma or Yuvraj Singh?
What is the price difference between Rohit Sharma and Yuvraj Singh?
How many MOTM awards have Rohit Sharma and Yuvraj Singh won?
Should I pick Rohit Sharma or Yuvraj Singh in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Rohit Sharma or Yuvraj Singh?
Who has more ODI runs, Rohit Sharma or Yuvraj Singh?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Rohit Sharma or Yuvraj Singh?
Who has more Test runs, Rohit Sharma or Yuvraj Singh?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Rohit Sharma or Yuvraj Singh — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.