⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Rohit Sharma vs Zaida James — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rohit Sharma (India) has 4,042 T20I runs at avg 30.9 in 153 matches. Zaida James (West Indies Women) has 125 T20I runs at avg 11.4 in 28 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Rohit Sharma vs Zaida James — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Rohit Sharma | Zaida James |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 12 | 2 |
| Avg fantasy points | 63 | 21 |
| Best fantasy score | 153 | 27 |
| Runs | 426 | 0 |
| Strike rate | 140.1 | 0.0 |
| Fours | 38 | 0 |
| Sixes | 27 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 0 |
| Highest score | 84 | 0 |
| Wickets | 0 | 1 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 8.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 1 |
| Catches | 4 | 1 |
| Total dismissals | 4 | 1 |
| Statistic | Rohit Sharma | Zaida James |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 153 | 28 |
| Runs | 4042 | 125 |
| Batting average | 30.85 | 11.36 |
| Strike rate | 140.6 | 77.6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 4 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 31 | 0 |
| Wickets | 1 | 7 |
| Bowling average | 103.00 | 40.71 |
| Economy rate | 9.97 | 7.67 |
Rohit Sharma vs Zaida James — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Rohit Sharma has scored 4,042 T20I runs in 153 matches at an average of 30.85, with 4 centuries. He has also taken 1 T20I wickets at an average of 103.00 with an economy of 9.97.
T20I career: Zaida James has scored 125 T20I runs in 28 matches at an average of 11.36. She has also taken 7 T20I wickets at an average of 40.71 with an economy of 7.67.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rohit Sharma is the stronger pick with an average of 63 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.