⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Rohit Sharma vs Zak Foulkes — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rohit Sharma (India) has 4,042 T20I runs at avg 30.9 in 153 matches. Zak Foulkes (Chennai Super Kings) has 100 T20I runs at avg 14.3 in 22 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Rohit Sharma vs Zak Foulkes — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Rohit Sharma | Zak Foulkes |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 12 | 1 |
| Avg fantasy points | 63 | 190 |
| Best fantasy score | 153 | 190 |
| Runs | 426 | 6 |
| Strike rate | 140.1 | 14.6 |
| Fours | 38 | 0 |
| Sixes | 27 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 0 |
| Highest score | 84 | 6 |
| Wickets | 0 | 6 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 3.28 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 6 |
| Catches | 4 | 0 |
| Total dismissals | 4 | 0 |
| Statistic | Rohit Sharma | Zak Foulkes |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 153 | 22 |
| Runs | 4042 | 100 |
| Batting average | 30.85 | 14.29 |
| Strike rate | 140.6 | 149.3 |
| Centuries (100+) | 4 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 31 | 0 |
| Wickets | 1 | 22 |
| Bowling average | 103.00 | 28.82 |
| Economy rate | 9.97 | 8.99 |
Rohit Sharma vs Zak Foulkes — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Rohit Sharma has scored 4,042 T20I runs in 153 matches at an average of 30.85, with 4 centuries. He has also taken 1 T20I wickets at an average of 103.00 with an economy of 9.97.
T20I career: Zak Foulkes has scored 100 T20I runs in 22 matches at an average of 14.29. He has also taken 22 T20I wickets at an average of 28.82 with an economy of 8.99.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Zak Foulkes is the stronger pick with an average of 190 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.