⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Ryan Rickelton vs Washington Sundar: Who Is Better? International Stats Comparison
Ryan Rickelton has the edge on the headline numbers: Ryan Rickelton leads on T20I batting (741 runs, avg 28.5). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Ryan Rickelton (Mumbai Indians) has 741 T20I runs at avg 28.5 in 29 matches. Washington Sundar (India) has 254 T20I runs at avg 16.9 in 58 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Ryan Rickelton vs Washington Sundar · Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Ryan Rickelton | Washington Sundar |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 77 | 53 |
| Best fantasy score | 259 | 223 |
| Runs | 847 | 387 |
| Strike rate | 106.1 | 112.2 |
| Fours | 74 | 37 |
| Sixes | 43 | 9 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 4 | 4 |
| Centuries (100+) | 2 | 0 |
| Highest score | 143 | 52 |
| Wickets | 0 | 9 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 5.17 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 5 |
| Catches | 15 | 8 |
| Total dismissals | 17 | 8 |
| Statistic | Ryan Rickelton | Washington Sundar |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 29 | 58 |
| Runs | 741 | 254 |
| Batting average | 28.50 | 16.93 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 4 | 1 |
| Wickets | 0 | 51 |
| Bowling average | — | 22.80 |
| Economy rate | — | 7.08 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Ryan Rickelton has played 29 T20Is and Washington Sundar 58. Ryan Rickelton has 741 runs at 28.5, against 254 at 16.9 for Washington Sundar, so Ryan Rickelton has scored more. Washington Sundar also bowls: 51 wickets at an economy of 7.08, while Ryan Rickelton has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Ryan Rickelton has played 19 ODIs and Washington Sundar 31. Ryan Rickelton has 552 runs at 32.5, against 426 at 22.4 (81.9) for Washington Sundar, so Ryan Rickelton has scored more. Hundreds: Ryan Rickelton 1, Washington Sundar 0. Fifties: 2 and 2. Washington Sundar also bowls: 29 wickets at an economy of 4.91, while Ryan Rickelton has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Ryan Rickelton has played 15 Tests and Washington Sundar 17. Ryan Rickelton has 897 runs at 37.4 (strike rate 52.9), against 885 at 42.1 (45.9) for Washington Sundar, so Ryan Rickelton has scored more. Hundreds: Ryan Rickelton 2, Washington Sundar 1. Fifties: 1 and 5. Washington Sundar also bowls: 36 wickets at an economy of 3.26, while Ryan Rickelton has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 16 July 2026.
Ryan Rickelton vs Washington Sundar · T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Ryan Rickelton has scored 741 T20I runs in 29 matches at an average of 28.50, with 4 half-centuries.
T20I career: Washington Sundar has scored 254 T20I runs in 58 matches at an average of 16.93, with 1 half-century. He has also taken 51 T20I wickets at an average of 22.80 with an economy of 7.08.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Ryan Rickelton is the stronger pick with an average of 77 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats, Ryan Rickelton or Washington Sundar?
Ryan Rickelton vs Washington Sundar: who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate, Ryan Rickelton or Washington Sundar?
What is the price difference between Ryan Rickelton and Washington Sundar?
How many MOTM awards have Ryan Rickelton and Washington Sundar won?
Should I pick Ryan Rickelton or Washington Sundar in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Ryan Rickelton or Washington Sundar?
Who has more ODI runs, Ryan Rickelton or Washington Sundar?
Who has more Test runs, Ryan Rickelton or Washington Sundar?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side, Ryan Rickelton or Washington Sundar, and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.