⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Salman Agha vs Virat Kohli — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Virat Kohli has the edge on the headline numbers: Virat Kohli leads on T20I batting (4,188 runs, avg 48.7). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Salman Agha (Pakistan) has 916 T20I runs at avg 22.9 in 52 matches. Virat Kohli (India) has 4,188 T20I runs at avg 48.7 in 125 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Salman Agha vs Virat Kohli — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Salman Agha | Virat Kohli |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 7 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 33 | 81 |
| Best fantasy score | 72 | 211 |
| Runs | 73 | 890 |
| Strike rate | 50.3 | 150.6 |
| Fours | 11 | 92 |
| Sixes | 0 | 32 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 2 |
| Highest score | 25 | 139 |
| Wickets | 1 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 5.50 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 1 | 0 |
| Catches | 9 | 10 |
| Total dismissals | 9 | 11 |
| Statistic | Salman Agha | Virat Kohli |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 52 | 125 |
| Runs | 916 | 4188 |
| Batting average | 22.90 | 48.70 |
| Strike rate | — | 137.0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 6 | 38 |
| Wickets | 6 | 4 |
| Bowling average | 24.33 | 51.00 |
| Economy rate | 7.68 | 8.05 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Salman Agha has played 52 T20Is and Virat Kohli 125. Salman Agha has 916 runs at 22.9, against 4,188 at 48.7 (137.0) for Virat Kohli, so Virat Kohli has scored more. Hundreds: Salman Agha 0, Virat Kohli 1. Fifties: 6 and 38. With the ball, Salman Agha has 6 wickets at an economy of 7.68 and Virat Kohli 4 at 8.05; Salman Agha has more wickets.
ODI. Salman Agha has played 53 ODIs and Virat Kohli 315. Salman Agha has 1,566 runs at 42.3, against 15,080 at 59.1 (95.5) for Virat Kohli, so Virat Kohli has scored more. Hundreds: Salman Agha 3, Virat Kohli 55. Fifties: 9 and 79. With the ball, Salman Agha has 20 wickets at an economy of 5.85 and Virat Kohli 5 at 6.16; Salman Agha has more wickets.
Test. Salman Agha has played 28 Tests and Virat Kohli 123. Salman Agha has 1,708 runs at 36.3 (strike rate 61.4), against 9,230 at 46.9 (55.6) for Virat Kohli, so Virat Kohli has scored more. Hundreds: Salman Agha 3, Virat Kohli 30. Fifties: 12 and 31. Salman Agha also bowls: 20 wickets at an economy of 3.77, while Virat Kohli has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 19 August 2026.
Salman Agha vs Virat Kohli — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Salman Agha has scored 916 T20I runs in 52 matches at an average of 22.90, with 6 half-centuries. He has also taken 6 T20I wickets at an average of 24.33 with an economy of 7.68.
T20I career: Virat Kohli has scored 4,188 T20I runs in 125 matches at an average of 48.70, with 1 century. He has also taken 4 T20I wickets at an average of 51.00 with an economy of 8.05.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Virat Kohli is the stronger pick with an average of 81 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Salman Agha or Virat Kohli?
Salman Agha vs Virat Kohli — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Salman Agha or Virat Kohli?
What is the price difference between Salman Agha and Virat Kohli?
How many MOTM awards have Salman Agha and Virat Kohli won?
Should I pick Salman Agha or Virat Kohli in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Salman Agha or Virat Kohli?
Who has more ODI runs, Salman Agha or Virat Kohli?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Salman Agha or Virat Kohli?
Who has more Test runs, Salman Agha or Virat Kohli?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Salman Agha or Virat Kohli — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.