⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Shaheen Shah Afridi vs Shubman Gill — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Shubman Gill has the edge on the headline numbers: Shubman Gill leads on T20I batting (869 runs, avg 28.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Shaheen Shah Afridi (Pakistan) has 345 T20I runs at avg 14.4 in 103 matches. Shubman Gill (India) has 869 T20I runs at avg 28.0 in 36 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Shaheen Shah Afridi vs Shubman Gill — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Shaheen Shah Afridi | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 6 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 74 | 109 |
| Best fantasy score | 127 | 329 |
| Runs | 16 | 1288 |
| Strike rate | 64.0 | 113.5 |
| Fours | 2 | 163 |
| Sixes | 0 | 29 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 5 |
| Highest score | 11 | 223 |
| Wickets | 11 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 5.82 | 4.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 3 | 0 |
| Catches | 2 | 12 |
| Total dismissals | 2 | 15 |
| Statistic | Shaheen Shah Afridi | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 103 | 36 |
| Runs | 345 | 869 |
| Batting average | 14.38 | 28.03 |
| Strike rate | 128.3 | — |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 3 |
| Wickets | 136 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 21.35 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Shaheen Shah Afridi has played 103 T20Is and Shubman Gill 36. Shaheen Shah Afridi has 345 runs at 14.4 (strike rate 128.3), against 869 at 28.0 for Shubman Gill, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Shaheen Shah Afridi 0, Shubman Gill 1. Fifties: 0 and 3. Shaheen Shah Afridi also bowls: 136 wickets, while Shubman Gill has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Shaheen Shah Afridi has played 77 ODIs and Shubman Gill 70. Shaheen Shah Afridi has 332 runs at 13.3 (strike rate 88.5), against 3,713 at 64.0 for Shubman Gill, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Shaheen Shah Afridi 0, Shubman Gill 11. Fifties: 0 and 20. Shaheen Shah Afridi also bowls: 146 wickets, while Shubman Gill has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Shaheen Shah Afridi has played 34 Tests and Shubman Gill 43. Shaheen Shah Afridi has 269 runs at 7.3 (strike rate 42.8), against 3,043 at 43.5 for Shubman Gill, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Shaheen Shah Afridi 0, Shubman Gill 11. Fifties: 0 and 8. Shaheen Shah Afridi also bowls: 126 wickets at an economy of 3.18, while Shubman Gill has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 23 August 2026.
Shaheen Shah Afridi vs Shubman Gill — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Shaheen Shah Afridi has scored 345 T20I runs in 103 matches at an average of 14.38. He has also taken 136 T20I wickets at an average of 21.35.
T20I career: Shubman Gill has scored 869 T20I runs in 36 matches at an average of 28.03, with 1 century.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shubman Gill is the stronger pick with an average of 109 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Shaheen Shah Afridi or Shubman Gill?
Shaheen Shah Afridi vs Shubman Gill — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Shaheen Shah Afridi or Shubman Gill?
What is the price difference between Shaheen Shah Afridi and Shubman Gill?
How many MOTM awards have Shaheen Shah Afridi and Shubman Gill won?
Should I pick Shaheen Shah Afridi or Shubman Gill in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Shaheen Shah Afridi or Shubman Gill?
Who has more ODI runs, Shaheen Shah Afridi or Shubman Gill?
Who has more Test runs, Shaheen Shah Afridi or Shubman Gill?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Shaheen Shah Afridi or Shubman Gill — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.