⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Shardul Thakur vs Shubman Gill — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Shardul Thakur has the edge on the headline numbers: Shardul Thakur leads on T20I batting (158 runs, avg 31.6). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Shardul Thakur (Mumbai Indians) has 158 T20I runs at avg 31.6 in 28 matches. Shubman Gill (India) has 869 T20I runs at avg 28.0 in 36 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Shardul Thakur vs Shubman Gill — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Shardul Thakur | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 9 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 45 | 109 |
| Best fantasy score | 129 | 329 |
| Runs | 20 | 1288 |
| Strike rate | 87.0 | 113.5 |
| Fours | 2 | 163 |
| Sixes | 0 | 29 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 5 |
| Highest score | 10 | 223 |
| Wickets | 12 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 10.50 | 4.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 4 | 0 |
| Catches | 0 | 12 |
| Total dismissals | 1 | 15 |
| Statistic | Shardul Thakur | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 28 | 36 |
| Runs | 158 | 869 |
| Batting average | 31.60 | 28.03 |
| Strike rate | 146.3 | — |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 1 | 3 |
| Wickets | 36 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 23.42 | — |
| Economy rate | 9.03 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Shardul Thakur has played 28 T20Is and Shubman Gill 36. Shardul Thakur has 158 runs at 31.6 (strike rate 146.3), against 869 at 28.0 for Shubman Gill, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Shardul Thakur 0, Shubman Gill 1. Fifties: 1 and 3. Shardul Thakur also bowls: 36 wickets at an economy of 9.03, while Shubman Gill has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Shardul Thakur has played 47 ODIs and Shubman Gill 70. Shardul Thakur has 329 runs at 17.3 (strike rate 105.1), against 3,713 at 64.0 for Shubman Gill, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Shardul Thakur 0, Shubman Gill 11. Fifties: 1 and 20. Shardul Thakur also bowls: 65 wickets at an economy of 6.25, while Shubman Gill has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Shardul Thakur has played 13 Tests and Shubman Gill 43. Shardul Thakur has 377 runs at 18.9 (strike rate 59.8), against 3,043 at 43.5 for Shubman Gill, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Shardul Thakur 0, Shubman Gill 11. Fifties: 4 and 8. Shardul Thakur also bowls: 33 wickets at an economy of 3.81, while Shubman Gill has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 23 August 2026.
Shardul Thakur vs Shubman Gill — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Shardul Thakur has scored 158 T20I runs in 28 matches at an average of 31.60, with 1 half-century. He has also taken 36 T20I wickets at an average of 23.42 with an economy of 9.03.
T20I career: Shubman Gill has scored 869 T20I runs in 36 matches at an average of 28.03, with 1 century.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shubman Gill is the stronger pick with an average of 109 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Shardul Thakur or Shubman Gill?
Shardul Thakur vs Shubman Gill — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Shardul Thakur or Shubman Gill?
What is the price difference between Shardul Thakur and Shubman Gill?
How many MOTM awards have Shardul Thakur and Shubman Gill won?
Should I pick Shardul Thakur or Shubman Gill in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Shardul Thakur or Shubman Gill?
Who has more ODI runs, Shardul Thakur or Shubman Gill?
Who has more Test runs, Shardul Thakur or Shubman Gill?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Shardul Thakur or Shubman Gill — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.