⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Shreyas Iyer vs Sikandar Raza: Who Is Better? International Stats Comparison
Shreyas Iyer has the edge on the headline numbers: Shreyas Iyer leads on T20I batting (1,615 runs, avg 33.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Shreyas Iyer (India) has 1,615 T20I runs at avg 33.0 in 68 matches. Sikandar Raza (Zimbabwe) has 2,740 T20I runs at avg 25.6 in 123 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Shreyas Iyer vs Sikandar Raza — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Shreyas Iyer | Sikandar Raza |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 48 | 63 |
| Best fantasy score | 200 | 169 |
| Runs | 582 | 452 |
| Strike rate | 132.6 | 97.4 |
| Fours | 51 | 37 |
| Sixes | 16 | 12 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 2 | 2 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 102 | 81 |
| Wickets | 0 | 14 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 6.37 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 2 |
| Catches | 5 | 10 |
| Total dismissals | 7 | 12 |
| Statistic | Shreyas Iyer | Sikandar Raza |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 68 | 123 |
| Runs | 1615 | 2740 |
| Batting average | 32.96 | 25.61 |
| Strike rate | — | 136.3 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 10 | 15 |
| Wickets | 0 | 103 |
| Bowling average | — | 24.06 |
| Economy rate | 6.00 | 7.08 |
| Five-wicket hauls | 0 | 1 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Shreyas Iyer has played 68 T20Is and Sikandar Raza 123. Shreyas Iyer has 1,615 runs at 33.0, against 2,740 at 25.6 (136.3) for Sikandar Raza, so Sikandar Raza has scored more. Hundreds: Shreyas Iyer 1, Sikandar Raza 1. Fifties: 10 and 15. Sikandar Raza also bowls: 103 wickets at an economy of 7.08, while Shreyas Iyer has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Shreyas Iyer has played 82 ODIs and Sikandar Raza 128. Shreyas Iyer has 3,136 runs at 45.5, against 3,707 at 36.7 (87.8) for Sikandar Raza, so Sikandar Raza has scored more. Hundreds: Shreyas Iyer 5, Sikandar Raza 6. Fifties: 24 and 20. Sikandar Raza also bowls: 76 wickets at an economy of 4.96, while Shreyas Iyer has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Shreyas Iyer has played 14 Tests and Sikandar Raza 18. Shreyas Iyer has 811 runs at 36.9 (strike rate 63.0), against 1,120 at 31.1 (54.6) for Sikandar Raza, so Sikandar Raza has scored more. Hundreds: Shreyas Iyer 1, Sikandar Raza 1. Fifties: 5 and 8. Sikandar Raza also bowls: 34 wickets at an economy of 3.30, while Shreyas Iyer has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 1 September 2026.
Shreyas Iyer vs Sikandar Raza — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Shreyas Iyer has scored 1,615 T20I runs in 68 matches at an average of 32.96, with 1 century.
T20I career: Sikandar Raza has scored 2,740 T20I runs in 123 matches at an average of 25.61, with 1 century. He has also taken 103 T20I wickets at an average of 24.06 with an economy of 7.08.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Sikandar Raza is the stronger pick with an average of 63 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Shreyas Iyer or Sikandar Raza?
Shreyas Iyer vs Sikandar Raza — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Shreyas Iyer or Sikandar Raza?
What is the price difference between Shreyas Iyer and Sikandar Raza?
How many MOTM awards have Shreyas Iyer and Sikandar Raza won?
Should I pick Shreyas Iyer or Sikandar Raza in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Shreyas Iyer or Sikandar Raza?
Who has more ODI runs, Shreyas Iyer or Sikandar Raza?
Who has more Test runs, Shreyas Iyer or Sikandar Raza?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Shreyas Iyer or Sikandar Raza — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.