⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Shubman Gill vs Sophie Ecclestone — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Shubman Gill has the edge on the headline numbers: Shubman Gill leads on T20I batting (869 runs, avg 28.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Shubman Gill (India) has 869 T20I runs at avg 28.0 in 36 matches. Sophie Ecclestone (England Women) has 368 T20I runs at avg 17.5 in 113 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Shubman Gill vs Sophie Ecclestone — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Shubman Gill | Sophie Ecclestone |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 18 |
| Avg fantasy points | 109 | 68 |
| Best fantasy score | 329 | 337 |
| Runs | 1288 | 97 |
| Strike rate | 113.5 | 82.2 |
| Fours | 163 | 12 |
| Sixes | 29 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 6 | 1 |
| Centuries (100+) | 5 | 0 |
| Highest score | 223 | 61 |
| Wickets | 0 | 27 |
| Economy rate | 4.00 | 4.90 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 8 |
| Catches | 12 | 5 |
| Total dismissals | 15 | 8 |
| Statistic | Shubman Gill | Sophie Ecclestone |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 36 | 113 |
| Runs | 869 | 368 |
| Batting average | 28.03 | 17.52 |
| Strike rate | — | 132.8 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 0 |
| Wickets | 0 | 154 |
| Bowling average | — | 16.51 |
| Economy rate | — | 6.05 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Shubman Gill has played 36 T20Is and Sophie Ecclestone 113. Shubman Gill has 869 runs at 28.0, against 368 at 17.5 (132.8) for Sophie Ecclestone, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Shubman Gill 1, Sophie Ecclestone 0. Fifties: 3 and 0. Sophie Ecclestone also bowls: 154 wickets at an economy of 6.05, while Shubman Gill has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Shubman Gill has played 70 ODIs and Sophie Ecclestone 84. Shubman Gill has 3,713 runs at 64.0, against 426 at 10.7 (73.6) for Sophie Ecclestone, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Shubman Gill 11, Sophie Ecclestone 0. Fifties: 20 and 0. Sophie Ecclestone also bowls: 141 wickets, while Shubman Gill has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Shubman Gill has played 43 Tests and Sophie Ecclestone 10. Shubman Gill has 3,043 runs at 43.5, against 257 at 19.8 (46.6) for Sophie Ecclestone, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Shubman Gill 11, Sophie Ecclestone 0. Fifties: 8 and 1. Sophie Ecclestone also bowls: 48 wickets at an economy of 2.91, while Shubman Gill has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 23 August 2026.
Shubman Gill vs Sophie Ecclestone — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Shubman Gill has scored 869 T20I runs in 36 matches at an average of 28.03, with 1 century.
T20I career: Sophie Ecclestone has scored 368 T20I runs in 113 matches at an average of 17.52. She has also taken 154 T20I wickets at an average of 16.51 with an economy of 6.05.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shubman Gill is the stronger pick with an average of 109 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Shubman Gill or Sophie Ecclestone?
Shubman Gill vs Sophie Ecclestone — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Shubman Gill or Sophie Ecclestone?
What is the price difference between Shubman Gill and Sophie Ecclestone?
How many MOTM awards have Shubman Gill and Sophie Ecclestone won?
Should I pick Shubman Gill or Sophie Ecclestone in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Shubman Gill or Sophie Ecclestone?
Who has more ODI runs, Shubman Gill or Sophie Ecclestone?
Who has more Test runs, Shubman Gill or Sophie Ecclestone?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Shubman Gill or Sophie Ecclestone — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.