⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Shubman Gill vs Tahlia McGrath — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Tahlia McGrath has the edge on the headline numbers: Tahlia McGrath leads on T20I batting (1,155 runs, avg 41.3). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Shubman Gill (India) has 869 T20I runs at avg 28.0 in 36 matches. Tahlia McGrath (Australia Women) has 1,155 T20I runs at avg 41.3 in 59 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Shubman Gill vs Tahlia McGrath — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Shubman Gill | Tahlia McGrath |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 5 |
| Avg fantasy points | 109 | 31 |
| Best fantasy score | 329 | 96 |
| Runs | 1288 | 40 |
| Strike rate | 113.5 | 72.7 |
| Fours | 163 | 2 |
| Sixes | 29 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 6 | 0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 5 | 0 |
| Highest score | 223 | 24 |
| Wickets | 0 | 3 |
| Economy rate | 4.00 | 4.60 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 2 |
| Catches | 12 | 0 |
| Total dismissals | 15 | 0 |
| Statistic | Shubman Gill | Tahlia McGrath |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 36 | 59 |
| Runs | 869 | 1155 |
| Batting average | 28.03 | 41.25 |
| Strike rate | — | 132.0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 7 |
| Wickets | 0 | 21 |
| Bowling average | — | 24.57 |
| Economy rate | — | 8.13 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Shubman Gill has played 36 T20Is and Tahlia McGrath 59. Shubman Gill has 869 runs at 28.0, against 1,155 at 41.3 (132.0) for Tahlia McGrath, so Tahlia McGrath has scored more. Hundreds: Shubman Gill 1, Tahlia McGrath 0. Fifties: 3 and 7. Tahlia McGrath also bowls: 21 wickets at an economy of 8.13, while Shubman Gill has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Shubman Gill has played 70 ODIs and Tahlia McGrath 59. Shubman Gill has 3,713 runs at 64.0, against 861 at 26.1 (87.9) for Tahlia McGrath, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Shubman Gill 11, Tahlia McGrath 0. Fifties: 20 and 5. Tahlia McGrath also bowls: 32 wickets at an economy of 5.19, while Shubman Gill has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Shubman Gill has played 43 Tests and Tahlia McGrath 8. Shubman Gill has 3,043 runs at 43.5, against 371 at 33.7 (49.7) for Tahlia McGrath, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Shubman Gill 11, Tahlia McGrath 0. Fifties: 8 and 4. Tahlia McGrath also bowls: 11 wickets at an economy of 2.53, while Shubman Gill has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 23 August 2026.
Shubman Gill vs Tahlia McGrath — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Shubman Gill has scored 869 T20I runs in 36 matches at an average of 28.03, with 1 century.
T20I career: Tahlia McGrath has scored 1,155 T20I runs in 59 matches at an average of 41.25, with 7 half-centuries. She has also taken 21 T20I wickets at an average of 24.57 with an economy of 8.13.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shubman Gill is the stronger pick with an average of 109 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Shubman Gill or Tahlia McGrath?
Shubman Gill vs Tahlia McGrath — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Shubman Gill or Tahlia McGrath?
What is the price difference between Shubman Gill and Tahlia McGrath?
How many MOTM awards have Shubman Gill and Tahlia McGrath won?
Should I pick Shubman Gill or Tahlia McGrath in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Shubman Gill or Tahlia McGrath?
Who has more ODI runs, Shubman Gill or Tahlia McGrath?
Who has more Test runs, Shubman Gill or Tahlia McGrath?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Shubman Gill or Tahlia McGrath — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.